Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Note on shifted primes with large prime factors

Yuchen Ding, Zhiwei Wang

TL;DR

This paper investigates primes $p\le x$ with the property that the largest prime factor of $p-1$ is at least $p^c$, quantified by $T_c(x)$. It advances the unconditional bound on the proportion of such primes by combining a Rosser–Iwaniec linear sieve with a Bombieri–Friedlander–Iwaniec type distribution result, yielding $\limsup_{x\to\infty} T_c(x)/\pi(x)\le -\frac{7}{2}\log c$ for $e^{-{2/7}}<c<1$; this improves prior bounds that required $c$ to be closer to $1$ and broadens the applicable range of $c$. The approach also yields corollaries such as $\limsup_{x\to\infty} T_c(x)/\pi(x)<1/2$ for $c>e^{-1/7}$, representing a substantial sharpening of previous estimates. The results highlight the effectiveness of refined sieve methods and level of distribution estimates in understanding shifted primes with large prime factors and have implications for related problems in prime gaps and arithmetic progressions. All key constants and bounds are explicit up to $o(1)$ terms, and the methods bridge classical sieve techniques with modern distribution results.

Abstract

For any $0<c<1$ let $$ T_c(x)=|\big\{p\le x: p\in \mathbb{P}, P^+(p-1)\ge p^c\big\}|, $$ where $\mathbb{P}$ is the set of primes and $P^+(n)$ denotes the largest prime factor of $n$. Erd\H os proved in 1935 that $$ \limsup_{x\rightarrow \infty}T_c(x)/π(x)\rightarrow 0, \quad \text{as~}c\rightarrow 1, $$ where $π(x)$ denotes the number of primes not exceeding $x$. Recently, Ding gave a quantitative form of Erd\H os' result and showed that for $8/9< c<1$ we have $$ \limsup_{x\rightarrow \infty}T_c(x)/π(x)\le 8\big(c^{-1}-1\big). $$ In this article, Ding's bound is improved to $$ \limsup_{x\rightarrow \infty}T_c(x)/π(x)\le -\frac{7}{2}\log c $$ for $e^{-\frac{2}{7}}< c<1$.

Note on shifted primes with large prime factors

TL;DR

This paper investigates primes with the property that the largest prime factor of is at least , quantified by . It advances the unconditional bound on the proportion of such primes by combining a Rosser–Iwaniec linear sieve with a Bombieri–Friedlander–Iwaniec type distribution result, yielding for ; this improves prior bounds that required to be closer to and broadens the applicable range of . The approach also yields corollaries such as for , representing a substantial sharpening of previous estimates. The results highlight the effectiveness of refined sieve methods and level of distribution estimates in understanding shifted primes with large prime factors and have implications for related problems in prime gaps and arithmetic progressions. All key constants and bounds are explicit up to terms, and the methods bridge classical sieve techniques with modern distribution results.

Abstract

For any let where is the set of primes and denotes the largest prime factor of . Erd\H os proved in 1935 that where denotes the number of primes not exceeding . Recently, Ding gave a quantitative form of Erd\H os' result and showed that for we have In this article, Ding's bound is improved to for .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 7 theorems, 69 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

Wu There exist two functions $K_2(\theta)>K_1(\theta)>0$, defined on the interval $(0,17/32)$ such that for each fixed $A>0$, and sufficiently large $Q=x^\theta$, the inequalities hold for all integers $m\in(Q,2Q]$ with at most $O\left(Q(\log Q)^{-A}\right)$ exceptions, where the implied constant depends only on $A$ and $\theta$. Moreover, for any fixed $\varepsilon>0$, these functions can be cho

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • Proposition 1.2
  • Theorem 1.1
  • Remark 1
  • Corollary 1.1
  • Remark 2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Remark 3
  • Lemma 2.3