Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Heterogeneous Graph Representation of Stiffened Panels with Non-Uniform Boundary Conditions and Loads

Yuecheng Cai, Jasmin Jelovica

TL;DR

The paper targets efficient surrogate modeling for stiffened panels under non-uniform boundary conditions and loads by introducing a heterogeneous graph representation that separates geometry, boundary, and loading information into distinct node types. It leverages a heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) with edge-type and spatial-relationship awareness to predict von Mises stress and displacement fields, outperforming a prior homogeneous-graph approach. Through ablation studies and four case analyses (including patch loads and box-beam scenarios), the authors demonstrate that graph heterogeneity significantly improves predictive accuracy, especially for non-uniform boundary conditions, while exposing trade-offs in parameter count and training complexity. The work offers a robust framework for rapid, physics-informed surrogate modeling of thin-walled structural components with complex loading and support patterns, facilitating design optimization and real-time decision-making.

Abstract

Surrogate models are essential in structural analysis and optimization. We propose a heterogeneous graph representation of stiffened panels that accounts for geometrical variability, non-uniform boundary conditions, and diverse loading scenarios, using heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs). The structure is partitioned into multiple structural units, such as stiffeners and the plates between them, with each unit represented by three distinct node types: geometry, boundary, and loading nodes. Edge heterogeneity is introduced by incorporating local orientations and spatial relationships of the connecting nodes. Several heterogeneous graph representations, each with varying degrees of heterogeneity, are proposed and analyzed. These representations are implemented into a heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) to predict von Mises stress and displacement fields across stiffened panels, based on loading and degrees of freedom at their boundaries. To assess the efficacy of our approach, we conducted numerical tests on panels subjected to patch loads and box beams composed of stiffened panels under various loading conditions. The heterogeneous graph representation was compared with a homogeneous counterpart, demonstrating superior performance. Additionally, an ablation analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of graph heterogeneity on HGT performance. The results show strong predictive accuracy for both displacement and von Mises stress, effectively capturing structural behavior patterns and maximum values.

Heterogeneous Graph Representation of Stiffened Panels with Non-Uniform Boundary Conditions and Loads

TL;DR

The paper targets efficient surrogate modeling for stiffened panels under non-uniform boundary conditions and loads by introducing a heterogeneous graph representation that separates geometry, boundary, and loading information into distinct node types. It leverages a heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) with edge-type and spatial-relationship awareness to predict von Mises stress and displacement fields, outperforming a prior homogeneous-graph approach. Through ablation studies and four case analyses (including patch loads and box-beam scenarios), the authors demonstrate that graph heterogeneity significantly improves predictive accuracy, especially for non-uniform boundary conditions, while exposing trade-offs in parameter count and training complexity. The work offers a robust framework for rapid, physics-informed surrogate modeling of thin-walled structural components with complex loading and support patterns, facilitating design optimization and real-time decision-making.

Abstract

Surrogate models are essential in structural analysis and optimization. We propose a heterogeneous graph representation of stiffened panels that accounts for geometrical variability, non-uniform boundary conditions, and diverse loading scenarios, using heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs). The structure is partitioned into multiple structural units, such as stiffeners and the plates between them, with each unit represented by three distinct node types: geometry, boundary, and loading nodes. Edge heterogeneity is introduced by incorporating local orientations and spatial relationships of the connecting nodes. Several heterogeneous graph representations, each with varying degrees of heterogeneity, are proposed and analyzed. These representations are implemented into a heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) to predict von Mises stress and displacement fields across stiffened panels, based on loading and degrees of freedom at their boundaries. To assess the efficacy of our approach, we conducted numerical tests on panels subjected to patch loads and box beams composed of stiffened panels under various loading conditions. The heterogeneous graph representation was compared with a homogeneous counterpart, demonstrating superior performance. Additionally, an ablation analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of graph heterogeneity on HGT performance. The results show strong predictive accuracy for both displacement and von Mises stress, effectively capturing structural behavior patterns and maximum values.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 14 equations, 16 figures, 9 tables.

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of the proposed heterogeneous graph representation with the homogeneous graph representation. (a) Physical model of an example panel structure. (b) Corresponding finite element model. (c) Homogeneous graph representation. (d) Proposed heterogeneous graph representation of the example panel structure. (e) Predicted fields by either GNN or HGNN. In the proposed heterogeneous graph representation, geometry, external loading, boundary conditions for each structural unit (e.g., stiffener or plate between stiffeners) are defined as separate node types. In contrast, the homogeneous graph representation concatenates all this information into a single node.
  • Figure 2: Heterogeneous graph representation with different levels of heterogeneity (a) Separate DOFs (b) Separate DOFs + Isolated loading node (c) Separate DOFs + Edge node (d) Separate DOFs + Edge node + Isolated loading node (e) Combined DOFs (f) Combined DOFs + Isolated loading node.
  • Figure 3: Edge definition illustration. (a) 3D overview of the edge possible locations. (b) Local locations of edges on the x-axis. (c) Local locations of edges on the y-axis. (d) Local locations of edges on the z-axis.
  • Figure 4: Heterogeneous graph transformer architecture, with inputs and outputs of the network.
  • Figure 5: (a) Schematic of a stiffened panel. (b) Sectional-view of the finite element box beam model. (c) Loading conditions for box beams in test case 2. (d) Loading conditions for box beams in test case 3. (e) Loading conditions for box beams in test case 4.
  • ...and 11 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Definition 1: Homogeneous Graph
  • Definition 2: Heterogeneous Graph