Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Coefficient systems on the A_2 Bruhat-Tits building

Adam Jones

TL;DR

The work addresses a central obstruction (sur) in the mod-$p$ representation theory of reductive p-adic groups by linking it to the exactness of an oriented chain complex attached to a coefficient system on the Bruhat-Tits building. It develops a rank-2, type-\\tilde{A}_2 framework, focusing on G = $\\mathrm{SL}_3(K)$, and introduces new combinatorial tools—peaks, summits, crowns, and extended crowns—to analyze the geometric realization of the $\\widetilde{A}_2$ building. A key contribution is a strategy that reduces the global exactness question to local, region-by-region exactness and orbit-by-orbit control on boundary regions, supported by a crucial lemma that produces a single $A$-orbit on boundary edges after a suitable shift. The results provide strong evidence for exactness in the $\\widetilde{A}_2$ setting and lay a robust groundwork with a detailed combinatorial and homological framework that can be extended toward a full proof for higher ranks, with significant implications for the mod-$p$ local Langlands program.

Abstract

We address a conjecture (referred to as sur in the literature) in the representation theory of a reductive p-adic Lie group G which has important implications for the relationship between mod-p smooth representations and pro-p Iwahori-Hecke modules, and is currently only known for G of rank 1. We prove that sur follows from exactness of the associated oriented chain complex of a coefficient system, when restricted to a local region of the Bruhat-Tits building for G. Our main result gives strong evidence towards this exactness in the case where G=SL_3(K) for K a totally ramified extension of Q_p. We also develop new combinatorial techniques for analysing the geometric realisation of the A_2 Bruhat-Tits building, which are fundamental to the proof of our main result, and which we hope will inspire further investigation in Bruhat-Tits theory.

Coefficient systems on the A_2 Bruhat-Tits building

TL;DR

The work addresses a central obstruction (sur) in the mod- representation theory of reductive p-adic groups by linking it to the exactness of an oriented chain complex attached to a coefficient system on the Bruhat-Tits building. It develops a rank-2, type-\\tilde{A}_2 framework, focusing on G = , and introduces new combinatorial tools—peaks, summits, crowns, and extended crowns—to analyze the geometric realization of the building. A key contribution is a strategy that reduces the global exactness question to local, region-by-region exactness and orbit-by-orbit control on boundary regions, supported by a crucial lemma that produces a single -orbit on boundary edges after a suitable shift. The results provide strong evidence for exactness in the setting and lay a robust groundwork with a detailed combinatorial and homological framework that can be extended toward a full proof for higher ranks, with significant implications for the mod- local Langlands program.

Abstract

We address a conjecture (referred to as sur in the literature) in the representation theory of a reductive p-adic Lie group G which has important implications for the relationship between mod-p smooth representations and pro-p Iwahori-Hecke modules, and is currently only known for G of rank 1. We prove that sur follows from exactness of the associated oriented chain complex of a coefficient system, when restricted to a local region of the Bruhat-Tits building for G. Our main result gives strong evidence towards this exactness in the case where G=SL_3(K) for K a totally ramified extension of Q_p. We also develop new combinatorial techniques for analysing the geometric realisation of the A_2 Bruhat-Tits building, which are fundamental to the proof of our main result, and which we hope will inspire further investigation in Bruhat-Tits theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 32 sections, 59 theorems, 129 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Suppose $G=\mathbb{G}(K)$ for $\mathbb{G}$ split semisimple, simply connected. If Conjecture conj: exactness 1 holds for $\Delta=\Delta(G)$, then $\mathbb{X}^*\to\mathcal{H}$ is surjective, i.e. Conjecture sur holds for $G$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure :
  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (131)

  • Conjecture 1
  • Conjecture 2
  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.3
  • ...and 121 more