Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Motivic homotopy theory for perfect schemes

Christian Dahlhausen, Jeroen Hekking, Storm Wolters

TL;DR

We construct a perfect version of Morel–Voevodsky motivic homotopy theory over a perfect base in positive characteristic by inverting universal homeomorphisms via perfection, yielding a stable category $\mathrm{S}\mathscr{H}^{\mathrm{pf}}(S)$ with a six-functor formalism. A key result is that after inverting $p$, the classical motivic homotopy category agrees with the perfect theory: $\mathrm{S}\mathscr{H}(S_0)[1/p] \simeq \mathrm{S}\mathscr{H}^{\mathrm{pf}}(S) \simeq \mathrm{S}\mathscr{H}_{\mathrm{idh}}(S_0)$. The paper develops the $\mathrm{pcdh}$ and $\mathrm{idh}$ topologies, proves hypercompleteness, and establishes adjunctions between the classical and perfect theories, ensuring a coherent coefficient-system framework. It also analyzes Thom spaces, perfection of closed immersions, and fibered/perfect motivic spaces to support stability and functoriality, and shows connective K-theory is representable in the unstable pf motivic category via $\mathbb{Z}\times\mathrm{BGL}$, while full $K$-theory is not representable in the pf setting. Overall, the results provide a robust, $p$-localized, perfect-geometry–oriented motivic framework with a concrete comparison to the classical theory and applications to K-theory in positive characteristic.

Abstract

We construct a perfect version of Morel--Voevodsky's motivic homotopy category over a perfect base scheme in positive characteristic. By checking the axioms of a coefficient system, we establish a six-functor formalism. We show that multiplication by $p$ is already invertible in the perfect motivic homotopy catgory. By work of Elmanto--Khan the functor sending an $\mathbb{F}_p$-scheme $S$ to the category $\mathrm{S}\mathcal{H}(S)[1/p]$ is invariant under universal homeomorphisms, hence under perfections. Our result gives an explicit model for the localization of $\mathrm{S}\mathcal{H}$ at the universal homeomorphisms, which we conclude is the same as $\mathrm{S}\mathcal{H}[1/p]$.

Motivic homotopy theory for perfect schemes

TL;DR

We construct a perfect version of Morel–Voevodsky motivic homotopy theory over a perfect base in positive characteristic by inverting universal homeomorphisms via perfection, yielding a stable category with a six-functor formalism. A key result is that after inverting , the classical motivic homotopy category agrees with the perfect theory: . The paper develops the and topologies, proves hypercompleteness, and establishes adjunctions between the classical and perfect theories, ensuring a coherent coefficient-system framework. It also analyzes Thom spaces, perfection of closed immersions, and fibered/perfect motivic spaces to support stability and functoriality, and shows connective K-theory is representable in the unstable pf motivic category via , while full -theory is not representable in the pf setting. Overall, the results provide a robust, -localized, perfect-geometry–oriented motivic framework with a concrete comparison to the classical theory and applications to K-theory in positive characteristic.

Abstract

We construct a perfect version of Morel--Voevodsky's motivic homotopy category over a perfect base scheme in positive characteristic. By checking the axioms of a coefficient system, we establish a six-functor formalism. We show that multiplication by is already invertible in the perfect motivic homotopy catgory. By work of Elmanto--Khan the functor sending an -scheme to the category is invariant under universal homeomorphisms, hence under perfections. Our result gives an explicit model for the localization of at the universal homeomorphisms, which we conclude is the same as .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 61 theorems, 77 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The functor which sends an $\mathbb{F}_p$-scheme $S_0$ with perfection $S$ to the $\infty$-category $\mathrm{S}\mathscr{H}^\mathrm{pf}(S)$ satisfies smooth base change, the smooth projection formula, the gluing theorem, homotopy invariance, and Thom stability.

Theorems & Definitions (144)

  • Theorem 1: Corollary \ref{['Cor:SH_motivic_coefficient_systems']}
  • Theorem 2: Theorem \ref{['Thm:comparison-results-all']}
  • Lemma 1.1: BhattProjectivity
  • Lemma 1.3: BhattProjectivity
  • Lemma 1.4
  • proof
  • Definition 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Example 1.7
  • Remark 1.8
  • ...and 134 more