Spin glasses and the Parisi formula
Jean-Christophe Mourrat
TL;DR
The paper addresses the problem of identifying the limit free energy for spin-glass models beyond the classical Sherrington–Kirkpatrick (SK) framework, including multi-type and bipartite variants. It surveys the Parisi formula for the SK model, then presents an alternative un-inverted variational representation $f(\beta)=\sup_{\alpha\in\mathbf{Mart}}\{ \beta\sqrt{2}\mathbb{E}[\alpha_1 B_1]-\mathbb{E}[\phi^*(\alpha_1)]-\beta^2\sup_{t\in[0,1]} \int_t^1 (s-\mathbb{E}[\alpha_s^2]) ds \}$, derived via convex duality, and connects this to finite-$N$ and algorithmic considerations. A Hamilton–Jacobi PDE perspective is then developed by enriching the free energy with ultrametric parameters (path $q\in\mathcal{Q}$), yielding a limit equation $\partial_t f-\int_0^1 (\partial_q f)^2=0$ (for convex $\xi$) whose viscosity solution admits a variational form, recovering Parisi as a special case and guiding extensions to non-convex models like the bipartite case. The author conjectures a general un-inverted variational representation for all models with covariance $\mathbb{E}[H_N(\sigma)H_N(\tau)]=N\xi(\frac{\sigma\cdot\tau}{N})$, and outlines a program—via concave reformulations and affine-envelopes—to overcome non-convexity and establish such representations, potentially resolving main open questions in non-classical spin-glass models. Overall, the work proposes a unifying variational/PDE framework that links Parisi-type formulas, un-inverted representations, and Hamilton–Jacobi equations to tackle a broad class of spin-glass problems with practical and algorithmic implications.
Abstract
Spin glasses are models of statistical mechanics in which a large number of simple elements interact with one another in a disordered fashion. One of the fundamental results of the theory is the Parisi formula, which identifies the limit of the free energy of a large class of such models. Yet many interesting models remain out of reach of the classical theory, and direct generalizations of the Parisi formula yield invalid predictions. I will report here on some partial progress towards the resolution of this problem, which also brings a new perspective on classical results.
