Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Balancing Cost Savings and Import Dependence in Germany's Industry Transformation

Toni Seibold, Fabian Neumann, Falko Ueckerdt, Tom Brown

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions from the steel, fertiliser and plastic industries can be mitigated by producing their precursors with green hydrogen. In Germany, green production may be economically unviable due to high energy costs. This study quantifies the 'renewables pull' of cheaper production abroad and high-lights trade-offs between cost savings and import dependence. Using a detailed European energy system model coupled to global supply curves for hydrogen and industry precursors (hot briquetted iron, ammonia and methanol), we assess five scenarios with increasing degrees of freedom with respect to imports. We find that precursor import is preferred over hydrogen import because there are significant savings in hydrogen infrastructure. Cost savings in the German industry sector from shifting precursor production to European partners compared to domestic production are at 4.1 bnEUR/a or 11.2 %. This strategy captures 47.7 % of the cost savings achievable by precursor import from non-European countries, which lowers industry costs by 8.6 bnEUR/a (23.3 %). Moving energy-intensive precursor production abroad allows Germany to save costs while still retaining a substantial share of subsequent value-creating industry. However, cost savings must be weighed against the risks of import dependence, which can be mitigated by sourcing exclusively from regional partners.

Balancing Cost Savings and Import Dependence in Germany's Industry Transformation

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions from the steel, fertiliser and plastic industries can be mitigated by producing their precursors with green hydrogen. In Germany, green production may be economically unviable due to high energy costs. This study quantifies the 'renewables pull' of cheaper production abroad and high-lights trade-offs between cost savings and import dependence. Using a detailed European energy system model coupled to global supply curves for hydrogen and industry precursors (hot briquetted iron, ammonia and methanol), we assess five scenarios with increasing degrees of freedom with respect to imports. We find that precursor import is preferred over hydrogen import because there are significant savings in hydrogen infrastructure. Cost savings in the German industry sector from shifting precursor production to European partners compared to domestic production are at 4.1 bnEUR/a or 11.2 %. This strategy captures 47.7 % of the cost savings achievable by precursor import from non-European countries, which lowers industry costs by 8.6 bnEUR/a (23.3 %). Moving energy-intensive precursor production abroad allows Germany to save costs while still retaining a substantial share of subsequent value-creating industry. However, cost savings must be weighed against the risks of import dependence, which can be mitigated by sourcing exclusively from regional partners.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 3 equations, 19 figures.

Figures (19)

  • Figure 1: Scenario framework to explore the influence of imports on the German industry and energy system. While the Base scenario represents a domestic industry with hydrogen self-sufficiency, the geographic scope of allowed imports expands on the horizontal axis, while the diversity of import products increases on the vertical axis.
  • Figure 2: Consumer costs to meet industrial demand in Germany with savings across different levels of independence (a), relative cost savings overall and the industrial sector compared to the Base scenario (b) and prices of industry precursors in Germany (c).
  • Figure 3: German annual import of energy carriers across scenarios (a) and the share they contribute in meeting the total demand within the country (b). HBI volume is multiplied by 2.1 which is the hydrogen in MWh needed to reduce one ton of iron ore. Since the transport sector is not explicit part of this analysis, fuels are shown in the upper part of each trade balance.
  • Figure 4: Hydrogen production, infrastructure and price across scenarios spatially resolved for each model region.
  • Figure 5: Endogenous industry representation.
  • ...and 14 more figures