Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A semi-Lagrangian method for solving state constraint Mean Field Games in Macroeconomics

Fabio Camilli, Qing Tang, Yong-shen Zhou

TL;DR

This work develops a semi-Lagrangian framework for solving state-constrained mean field games arising in macroeconomic models of heterogeneous agents (Aiyagari–Bewley–Huggett). It couples a constrained Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation with a Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov equation and uses a dual SL scheme for the FP, along with Howard's policy iteration to handle borrowing constraints and an endogenously determined interest rate $r$. A strong comparison principle for constrained viscosity solutions is established, and convergence of the SL scheme to the constrained solution is proved via Barles–Souganidis arguments; the authors also provide fully discrete, implementable algorithms and demonstrate their approach on stationary and transition scenarios, capturing wealth distributions and policy responses. The results yield a robust computational tool for equilibria in continuous-time MFG macro models with state constraints, enabling reliable simulations of wealth dynamics and macroeconomic policy effects.

Abstract

We study continuous-time heterogeneous agent models cast as Mean Field Games, in the Aiyagari-Bewley-Huggett framework. The model couples a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for individual optimization with a Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equation for the wealth distribution. We establish a comparison principle for constrained viscosity solutions of the HJB equation and propose a semi-Lagrangian (SL) scheme for its numerical solution, proving convergence via the Barles-Souganidis method. A policy iteration algorithm handles state constraints, and a dual SL scheme is used for the FPK equation. Numerical methods are presented in a fully discrete, implementable form.

A semi-Lagrangian method for solving state constraint Mean Field Games in Macroeconomics

TL;DR

This work develops a semi-Lagrangian framework for solving state-constrained mean field games arising in macroeconomic models of heterogeneous agents (Aiyagari–Bewley–Huggett). It couples a constrained Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation with a Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov equation and uses a dual SL scheme for the FP, along with Howard's policy iteration to handle borrowing constraints and an endogenously determined interest rate . A strong comparison principle for constrained viscosity solutions is established, and convergence of the SL scheme to the constrained solution is proved via Barles–Souganidis arguments; the authors also provide fully discrete, implementable algorithms and demonstrate their approach on stationary and transition scenarios, capturing wealth distributions and policy responses. The results yield a robust computational tool for equilibria in continuous-time MFG macro models with state constraints, enabling reliable simulations of wealth dynamics and macroeconomic policy effects.

Abstract

We study continuous-time heterogeneous agent models cast as Mean Field Games, in the Aiyagari-Bewley-Huggett framework. The model couples a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for individual optimization with a Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equation for the wealth distribution. We establish a comparison principle for constrained viscosity solutions of the HJB equation and propose a semi-Lagrangian (SL) scheme for its numerical solution, proving convergence via the Barles-Souganidis method. A policy iteration algorithm handles state constraints, and a dual SL scheme is used for the FPK equation. Numerical methods are presented in a fully discrete, implementable form.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 17 theorems, 106 equations, 4 figures, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

Let $rx+y_j>0$, then

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Value function with $\gamma=2$ (left) and probability distribution (right)
  • Figure 2: Consumption (left) and saving (right)
  • Figure 3: MPC for $\gamma=2$ and $\gamma=4$
  • Figure 4: Evolution of interest rate in a dynamic Aiyagari model

Theorems & Definitions (37)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.6
  • Corollary 2.7
  • Proposition 2.8
  • ...and 27 more