Carleman Linearization of Parabolic PDEs: Well-posedness, convergence, and efficient numerical methods
Bernhard Heinzelreiter, John W. Pearson
TL;DR
This work develops a rigorous framework for the Carleman linearization of nonlinear parabolic PDEs by extending it to infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces with quadratic nonlinearities and proving well-posedness and convergence of truncated linearizations. A lifted, tensorized representation using Kronecker sums yields a finite, linear system that can be analyzed independently of discretization, enabling a clear linearization–discretization error decomposition and discretization-free convergence results under small-nonlinearity assumptions. The authors derive detailed function-space settings, operator bounds, and a transformed-coercive formulation to establish existence, uniqueness, and stability of the truncated Carleman system, along with explicit convergence bounds that depend on truncation level $N$, time horizon $T$, and data size. They show how non-standard discretizations, notably sparse grids, can mitigate the curse of dimensionality and validate the theory through Burgers-type numerical experiments, illustrating both the benefits and limitations of the approach for PDEs. Overall, the results provide a solid theoretical foundation for applying Carleman linearization to parabolic PDEs and point to promising avenues for efficient, structure-exploiting numerical methods.
Abstract
We explore how the analysis of the Carleman linearization can be extended to dynamical systems on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces with quadratic nonlinearities. We demonstrate the well-posedness and convergence of the truncated Carleman linearization under suitable assumptions on the dynamical system, which encompass common parabolic semi-linear partial differential equations such as the Navier-Stokes equations and nonlinear diffusion-advection-reaction equations. Upon discretization, we show that the total approximation error of the linearization decomposes into two independent components: the discretization error and the linearization error. This decomposition yields a convergence radius and convergence rate for the discretized linearization that are independent of the discretization. We thus justify the application of the linearization to parabolic PDE problems. Furthermore, it motivates the use of non-standard structure-exploiting numerical methods, such as sparse grids, taming the curse of dimensionality associated with the Carleman linearization. Finally, we verify the results with numerical experiments.
