Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Extensions Of Unirational Groups

Zev Rosengarten

TL;DR

The paper analyzes extensions of unirational algebraic groups over fields of positive characteristic. It proves that extensions preserve unirationality when the field has imperfection degree $1$, but provides explicit counterexamples for higher imperfection degrees, answering Achet’s question in the negative in those cases. It then introduces ext-unirational groups, establishing equivalences with centralizers of tori and with the maximal commutative $p$-torsion quotient, and shows that ext-unirationality passes through quotients and is birationally invariant. Finally, it relates unirationality of unipotent groups to quotients by their lower central series, showing that for imperfection degree up to $2$, unirationality is determined by $U^{ m ab}$, with sharp counterexamples for larger imperfection degrees. The results collectively clarify when unirationality is preserved by extensions and provide a framework based on filtrations and quotients for analyzing unirationality in imperfect fields.

Abstract

We undertake a study of extensions of unirational algebraic groups. We prove that extensions of unirational groups are also unirational over fields of degree of imperfection $1$, but that this fails over every field of higher degree of imperfection, answering a question of Achet. We also initiate a study of those groups which admit filtrations with unirational graded pieces, and show that one may deduce unirationality of unipotent groups from unirationality of certain quotients.

Extensions Of Unirational Groups

TL;DR

The paper analyzes extensions of unirational algebraic groups over fields of positive characteristic. It proves that extensions preserve unirationality when the field has imperfection degree , but provides explicit counterexamples for higher imperfection degrees, answering Achet’s question in the negative in those cases. It then introduces ext-unirational groups, establishing equivalences with centralizers of tori and with the maximal commutative -torsion quotient, and shows that ext-unirationality passes through quotients and is birationally invariant. Finally, it relates unirationality of unipotent groups to quotients by their lower central series, showing that for imperfection degree up to , unirationality is determined by , with sharp counterexamples for larger imperfection degrees. The results collectively clarify when unirationality is preserved by extensions and provide a framework based on filtrations and quotients for analyzing unirationality in imperfect fields.

Abstract

We undertake a study of extensions of unirational algebraic groups. We prove that extensions of unirational groups are also unirational over fields of degree of imperfection , but that this fails over every field of higher degree of imperfection, answering a question of Achet. We also initiate a study of those groups which admit filtrations with unirational graded pieces, and show that one may deduce unirationality of unipotent groups from unirationality of certain quotients.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 19 theorems, 50 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Given an exact sequence of unipotent $K$-groups with $U', U"$ permawound, $U$ is also permawound.

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • ...and 33 more