Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An Elementary Proof of the Nonexistence of Tarski Monster Groups of Exponent 3

Hiroshi Arai

TL;DR

The paper addresses the nonexistence of Tarski monster groups of exponent $3$, a fact usually established via deep results in the restricted Burnside problem and Burnside-type identities. It presents an fully elementary argument centered on the key equation $aa^g = a^g a$ that holds in every group of exponent $3$, with a remark connecting it to Hall's work on the free Burnside group. It then proves that any infinite group of exponent $3$ contains an infinite abelian subgroup by a case analysis on conjugacy classes, leading to a contradiction with the Tarski monster hypothesis. Consequently, no Tarski monster group of exponent $3$ exists, and the method provides an accessible, self-contained proof avoiding heavy prerequisites. This contributes to the educational toolkit for group theory by isolating a single simple identity as the core of the argument.

Abstract

It is well known that Tarski monster groups of exponent~3 do not exist. Traditional proofs rely on deep structural results, such as the restricted Burnside problem, properties of the free Burnside group, or Engel-type identities, and involve substantial technical computations. In this note we give a fully elementary proof: the argument reduces to a single simple identity, expressed as a key equation, whose verification requires only a brief calculation.

An Elementary Proof of the Nonexistence of Tarski Monster Groups of Exponent 3

TL;DR

The paper addresses the nonexistence of Tarski monster groups of exponent , a fact usually established via deep results in the restricted Burnside problem and Burnside-type identities. It presents an fully elementary argument centered on the key equation that holds in every group of exponent , with a remark connecting it to Hall's work on the free Burnside group. It then proves that any infinite group of exponent contains an infinite abelian subgroup by a case analysis on conjugacy classes, leading to a contradiction with the Tarski monster hypothesis. Consequently, no Tarski monster group of exponent exists, and the method provides an accessible, self-contained proof avoiding heavy prerequisites. This contributes to the educational toolkit for group theory by isolating a single simple identity as the core of the argument.

Abstract

It is well known that Tarski monster groups of exponent~3 do not exist. Traditional proofs rely on deep structural results, such as the restricted Burnside problem, properties of the free Burnside group, or Engel-type identities, and involve substantial technical computations. In this note we give a fully elementary proof: the argument reduces to a single simple identity, expressed as a key equation, whose verification requires only a brief calculation.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 3 theorems, 7 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1

In any group of exponent $3$, one has

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Lemma 1: Key Equation
  • proof
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Corollary 3
  • proof