Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On étale maps of sous-perfectoid adic spaces

Dmytro Rudenko

TL;DR

The work extends the classical étale criterion to affine sous-perfectoid adic spaces: a map $g:\mathrm{Spa}(B,{B}^{+})\to\mathrm{Spa}(A,{A}^{+})$ is étale precisely when $B$ admits a presentation $A\langle X_{1},\dots,X_{n} \rangle/(f_{1},\dots,f_{n})$ with $\det(\frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial X_{j}})\in B^{\times}$. The proof builds a global closed immersion factoring $g$ and upgrades to a global complete intersection using Kedlaya–Liu pseudocoherent theory, enabling a Jacobian-criterion analogue in the sous-perfectoid setting. A noetherian approximation result for perfectoid rings, echoing Scholze’s S17, follows as a corollary, and the thesis provides an explicit local description of the sheaf of differentials for smooth maps in terms of completed differentials $\widehat{\Omega^{1}_{B/A}}$. These results deepen étale theory in the perfectoid/diamond framework and connect with foundational aspects of étale cohomology in this context.

Abstract

We show that a map $\mathrm{Spa}\,B \to \mathrm{Spa}\,A$ of sous-perfectoid affinoid adic spaces is étale if and only if there exists a presentation $B \cong A\langle X_{1},\dots, X_{n} \rangle/(f_{1},\dots,f_{n})$ such that the determinant of the associated Jacobian matrix $\mathrm{det}( \frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial X_{j}})_{1\leqslant i, j\leqslant n}$ is a unit in $B$. This allows us to provide some technical details to an important claim from the theory of étale maps of perfectoid spaces. Namely, we show how our proposition implies a sort of noetherian approximation for perfectoid rings from "Étale cohomology of diamonds" by Peter Scholze [S17]. Apart from that, we give an explicit local description of the sheaf of differentials associated to a smooth map of sous-perfectoid adic spaces, as defined by Fargues-Scholze in [FS], in terms of the module of differentials.

On étale maps of sous-perfectoid adic spaces

TL;DR

The work extends the classical étale criterion to affine sous-perfectoid adic spaces: a map is étale precisely when admits a presentation with . The proof builds a global closed immersion factoring and upgrades to a global complete intersection using Kedlaya–Liu pseudocoherent theory, enabling a Jacobian-criterion analogue in the sous-perfectoid setting. A noetherian approximation result for perfectoid rings, echoing Scholze’s S17, follows as a corollary, and the thesis provides an explicit local description of the sheaf of differentials for smooth maps in terms of completed differentials . These results deepen étale theory in the perfectoid/diamond framework and connect with foundational aspects of étale cohomology in this context.

Abstract

We show that a map of sous-perfectoid affinoid adic spaces is étale if and only if there exists a presentation such that the determinant of the associated Jacobian matrix is a unit in . This allows us to provide some technical details to an important claim from the theory of étale maps of perfectoid spaces. Namely, we show how our proposition implies a sort of noetherian approximation for perfectoid rings from "Étale cohomology of diamonds" by Peter Scholze [S17]. Apart from that, we give an explicit local description of the sheaf of differentials associated to a smooth map of sous-perfectoid adic spaces, as defined by Fargues-Scholze in [FS], in terms of the module of differentials.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 33 theorems, 63 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

Let $g\colon\mathrm{Spec}\,B\to\mathrm{Spec}\,A$ be a map of affine schemes. Then $g$ is étale if and only if there exists a presentation $B\cong A[X_{1},\dots,X_{n}]/(f_{1},\dots, f_{n})$ such that the determinant of the associated Jacobian matrix $\mathrm{det}(\frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial X_{j}}

Theorems & Definitions (65)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • Proposition 1.2: simplified Hu96
  • Proposition 1.3: main proposition
  • Proposition 1.4: simplified S17
  • Definition 1.5: FS
  • Definition 1.6: FS
  • Proposition 1.7
  • Proposition 1.8
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • ...and 55 more