Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Free Option Problem of ePBS

Bruno Mazorra, Burak Öz, Christoph Schlegel, Fei Wu

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the Free Option Problem arising from enshrined Proposer–Builder Separation (ePBS) in Ethereum's Glamsterdam upgrade, where builders gain a short-dated option to withhold payloads and prevent a block from becoming canonical. It develops a theoretical model showing that the option value $V^*$ and exercise probability $P^*$ rise with market volatility $\sigma$, option window length $\tau$, liquidity $L$, and external MEV share, and validates these predictions with historical block data, finding an average exercise probability of $P^* \approx 0.82\%$ (for $\tau=8$ s) that spikes during high-volatility periods. The authors quantify how builder heterogeneity and cross-domain signals affect liveness, and propose mitigations — shortening the option window and imposing penalties — including a dynamic penalty mechanism via online gradient descent that can approach target exercise rates with manageable costs. They also discuss broader implications for on-chain price formation and for other time-sensitive applications like prediction markets. Overall, the work highlights a fundamental scalability-security trade-off in ePBS and offers protocol-level strategies to preserve liveness while preserving scaling benefits.

Abstract

Ethereum's upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade introduces EIP-7732 enshrined Proposer--Builder Separation (ePBS), which improves the block production pipeline by addressing trust and scalability challenges. Yet it also creates a new liveness risk: builders gain a short-dated ``free'' option to prevent the execution payload they committed to from becoming canonical, without incurring an additional penalty. Exercising this option renders an empty block for the slot in question, thereby degrading network liveness. We present the first systematic study of the free option problem. Our theoretical results predict that option value and exercise probability grow with market volatility, the length of the option window, and the share of block value derived from external signals such as external market prices. The availability of a free option will lead to mispricing and LP losses. The problem would be exacerbated if Ethereum further scales and attracts more liquidity. Empirical estimates of values and exercise probabilities on historical blocks largely confirm our theoretical predictions. While the option is rarely profitable to exercise on average (0.82\% of blocks assuming an 8-second option time window), it becomes significant in volatile periods, reaching up to 6\% of blocks on high-volatility days -- precisely when users most require timely execution. Moreover, builders whose block value relies heavily on CEX-DEX arbitrage are more likely to exercise the option. We demonstrate that mitigation strategies -- shortening the option window or penalizing exercised options -- effectively reduce liveness risk.

The Free Option Problem of ePBS

TL;DR

The paper analyzes the Free Option Problem arising from enshrined Proposer–Builder Separation (ePBS) in Ethereum's Glamsterdam upgrade, where builders gain a short-dated option to withhold payloads and prevent a block from becoming canonical. It develops a theoretical model showing that the option value and exercise probability rise with market volatility , option window length , liquidity , and external MEV share, and validates these predictions with historical block data, finding an average exercise probability of (for s) that spikes during high-volatility periods. The authors quantify how builder heterogeneity and cross-domain signals affect liveness, and propose mitigations — shortening the option window and imposing penalties — including a dynamic penalty mechanism via online gradient descent that can approach target exercise rates with manageable costs. They also discuss broader implications for on-chain price formation and for other time-sensitive applications like prediction markets. Overall, the work highlights a fundamental scalability-security trade-off in ePBS and offers protocol-level strategies to preserve liveness while preserving scaling benefits.

Abstract

Ethereum's upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade introduces EIP-7732 enshrined Proposer--Builder Separation (ePBS), which improves the block production pipeline by addressing trust and scalability challenges. Yet it also creates a new liveness risk: builders gain a short-dated ``free'' option to prevent the execution payload they committed to from becoming canonical, without incurring an additional penalty. Exercising this option renders an empty block for the slot in question, thereby degrading network liveness. We present the first systematic study of the free option problem. Our theoretical results predict that option value and exercise probability grow with market volatility, the length of the option window, and the share of block value derived from external signals such as external market prices. The availability of a free option will lead to mispricing and LP losses. The problem would be exacerbated if Ethereum further scales and attracts more liquidity. Empirical estimates of values and exercise probabilities on historical blocks largely confirm our theoretical predictions. While the option is rarely profitable to exercise on average (0.82\% of blocks assuming an 8-second option time window), it becomes significant in volatile periods, reaching up to 6\% of blocks on high-volatility days -- precisely when users most require timely execution. Moreover, builders whose block value relies heavily on CEX-DEX arbitrage are more likely to exercise the option. We demonstrate that mitigation strategies -- shortening the option window or penalizing exercised options -- effectively reduce liveness risk.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 8 theorems, 45 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 1

The DEX-price post trade (at $\tau=0$) is strictly greater than the CEX market price.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Daily missed block percentage with and without the ePBS free option and share of daily missed blocks by original causes and by the ePBS free option.
  • Figure 2: Slot pipeline and PTC deadlines under ePBS. Red markers indicate the free option window, which extends until the latest point when a strategic builder can release blobs while still ensuring the payload remains valid.
  • Figure 3: Evolution of block value $\Pi_b(t)$ and ETH/USDC price during slot 10990298. The inset depicts the option value.
  • Figure 4: (a) Histogram of daily option exercise probability. (b) Daily option exercise probability and ETH price volatility. (c) Histogram of daily aggregate option value. (d) Daily aggregate option value and ETH price volatility.
  • Figure 5: (a) Correlation between daily option exercise probability and average CEX-DEX flow value share. (b) Daily option exercise probability and blob count.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Remark 1
  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Example 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Proposition 4
  • Remark 2
  • Proposition 5
  • Proposition 6
  • ...and 7 more