Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cofinal families of finite VC-dimension

Omer Ben-Neria, Itay Kaplan, George Peterzil

TL;DR

This work studies the minimal VC-dimension of a $\\lambda$-cofinal family $\\mathcal{F}\\subseteq [\\kappa]^{<\\theta}$, formalized as $\\mathrm{VCcof}(\\lambda,\\theta,\\kappa)$. It develops the framework of $n$-ordering systems and $\\prec\cdot$-closed sets to construct cofinal families with controlled VC-dimension, and proves a sharp dichotomy depending on whether $\\theta$ is regular or singular. The paper obtains: (i) consistency results showing $\\mathrm{VCcof}(\\omega,\\omega,\\omega_n)=n+1$ for each $n$; (ii) a dichotomy for regular $\\theta$ giving an exact threshold $\\kappa=\\theta^{+n}$ for $\\mathrm{VCcof} = n+1$; (iii) a singular-cardinal obstruction where $\\mathrm{cof}(\\theta) <\\lambda$ forces infinite VC-dimension; and (iv) a Cohen-forcing construction demonstrating the consistency of finite-closure ordering systems yielding the predicted VC-dimensions on $\\omega_n$. These results illuminate a deep regular/singular split and connect to model-theoretic concepts like IP/NIP and PAC learnability, with potential applications in constructing extensive families of low-complexity definable sets.

Abstract

Given infinite cardinals $θ\leq κ$, we ask for the minimal VC-dimension of a cofinal family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq[κ]^{<θ}$. We show that for $θ=ω$ and $κ=\aleph_n$ it is consistent with ZFC that there exists such a family of VC-dimension $n+1$, which is known to be the lower bound. For $θ>ω$ we answer this question completely, demonstrating a strong dichotomy between the case of singular and regular $θ$. We furthermore answer some relative and generalized versions of the above question for singular $θ$, and answer a related question which appears in \cite{BBNKS}.

Cofinal families of finite VC-dimension

TL;DR

This work studies the minimal VC-dimension of a -cofinal family , formalized as . It develops the framework of -ordering systems and -closed sets to construct cofinal families with controlled VC-dimension, and proves a sharp dichotomy depending on whether is regular or singular. The paper obtains: (i) consistency results showing for each ; (ii) a dichotomy for regular giving an exact threshold for ; (iii) a singular-cardinal obstruction where forces infinite VC-dimension; and (iv) a Cohen-forcing construction demonstrating the consistency of finite-closure ordering systems yielding the predicted VC-dimensions on . These results illuminate a deep regular/singular split and connect to model-theoretic concepts like IP/NIP and PAC learnability, with potential applications in constructing extensive families of low-complexity definable sets.

Abstract

Given infinite cardinals , we ask for the minimal VC-dimension of a cofinal family . We show that for and it is consistent with ZFC that there exists such a family of VC-dimension , which is known to be the lower bound. For we answer this question completely, demonstrating a strong dichotomy between the case of singular and regular . We furthermore answer some relative and generalized versions of the above question for singular , and answer a related question which appears in \cite{BBNKS}.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 21 theorems, 5 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.4

Given $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \mathcal{P}(X)$ and $X_0\subseteq X$ we have that any subfamily $\mathcal{F}_0$ of the family $\mathcal{F}\restriction X_0=\{X_0\cap S: S\in\mathcal{F}\}$ satisfies $\mathop{\mathrm{VC}}\nolimits(\mathcal{F}_0)\leq \mathop{\mathrm{VC}}\nolimits(\mathcal{F})$. In particula

Theorems & Definitions (67)

  • Remark 1.4
  • Remark 1.5: \ref{['thm:main']}(\ref{['enu:regular']},\ref{['enu:singular']})
  • Remark 1.7: \ref{['thm:main']}(\ref{['enu:omega']},\ref{['enu:measurable']})
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 57 more