Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On a discrete version of the position-momentum commutation relation

Nicolae Cotfas

TL;DR

This work addresses how to realize a discrete analogue of the canonical position–momentum commutation relation in finite-dimensional quantum systems by focusing on a high-dimensional subspace where the commutator behaves as $[\hat{\mathfrak{q}},\hat{\mathfrak{p}}]\approx i\frac{d}{2\pi}$. The authors establish the subspace $\mathcal{S}_\varepsilon$ of states for which this approximation holds and derive an associated uncertainty bound $\Delta\hat{\mathfrak{q}}\Delta\hat{\mathfrak{p}}\ge\frac{d}{4\pi}$. They catalog and analyze several discrete-state families—discrete Gaussian states, discrete coherent states, and discrete analogs of Hermite–Gauss states (Mehta, Harper, Kravchuk)—and develop a discrete coherent-state quantization that yields a discrete harmonic-oscillator Hamiltonian with eigenstates in $\mathcal{S}_\varepsilon$. The results lay groundwork for new discrete-variable formalisms and potential quantum-information applications that leverage approximately canonical structures in high-dimensional qudits.

Abstract

The usual position-momentum commutation relation plays a fundamental role in the mathematical description of continuous-variable quantum systems. In the case of a qudit described by a Hilbert space of a high enough dimension, there exists a discrete version of the position-momentum commutation relation approximately satisfied by a large part of the pure quantum states. Our purpose is to explore in more details the set of these states. We show that it contains a family of discrete-variable Gaussian states depending on a continuous parameter and certain discrete coherent states. It also contains various discrete-variable versions of the Hermite-Gauss states, defined either as eigenstates of certain discrete versions of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian or generated by using a discrete version of the creation or annihilation operator. As a direct consequence, a discrete version of the incertitude relation is satisfied by the considered quantum states.

On a discrete version of the position-momentum commutation relation

TL;DR

This work addresses how to realize a discrete analogue of the canonical position–momentum commutation relation in finite-dimensional quantum systems by focusing on a high-dimensional subspace where the commutator behaves as . The authors establish the subspace of states for which this approximation holds and derive an associated uncertainty bound . They catalog and analyze several discrete-state families—discrete Gaussian states, discrete coherent states, and discrete analogs of Hermite–Gauss states (Mehta, Harper, Kravchuk)—and develop a discrete coherent-state quantization that yields a discrete harmonic-oscillator Hamiltonian with eigenstates in . The results lay groundwork for new discrete-variable formalisms and potential quantum-information applications that leverage approximately canonical structures in high-dimensional qudits.

Abstract

The usual position-momentum commutation relation plays a fundamental role in the mathematical description of continuous-variable quantum systems. In the case of a qudit described by a Hilbert space of a high enough dimension, there exists a discrete version of the position-momentum commutation relation approximately satisfied by a large part of the pure quantum states. Our purpose is to explore in more details the set of these states. We show that it contains a family of discrete-variable Gaussian states depending on a continuous parameter and certain discrete coherent states. It also contains various discrete-variable versions of the Hermite-Gauss states, defined either as eigenstates of certain discrete versions of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian or generated by using a discrete version of the creation or annihilation operator. As a direct consequence, a discrete version of the incertitude relation is satisfied by the considered quantum states.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 93 equations, 3 figures, 13 tables.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Discrete Gaussian functions: $\mathbf{g}_3$ and $\mathbf{g}_{1/3}$ in the case $d\!=\!31$.
  • Figure 2: Relation $[\hat{\mathfrak{q}},\hat{\mathfrak{p}}]\approx{\rm i}\hbox{\small $\frac{d}{2\pi }$}$ in Gaussian case : $\parallel ([\hat{\mathfrak{q}},\hat{\mathfrak{p}}]-{\rm i}\frac{d}{2\pi })\mathbf{g}_k||$ for $d\!=\!11$ and $d\!=\!31$.
  • Figure 3: Relation $\Delta\hat{\mathfrak{q}}\ \Delta\hat{\mathfrak{p}}\geq \hbox{\small $\frac{d}{4\pi }$}$ in Gaussian case : $|\ |\langle \mathbf{g}_k |[\hat{\mathfrak{q}},\hat{\mathfrak{p}}]|\mathbf{g}_k\rangle |-\frac{d}{2\pi }\ |$ for $d\!=\!11$ and $d\!=\!31$.