Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum sensing of a quantum field

Ricard Ravell Rodríguez, Martí Perarnau-Llobet, Pavel Sekatski

Abstract

Estimating a classical parameter encoded in the Hamiltonian of a quantum probe is a fundamental and well-understood task in quantum metrology. A textbook example is the estimation of a classical field's amplitude using a two-level probe, as described by the semi-classical Rabi model. In this work, we explore the fully quantum analogue, where the amplitude of a coherent quantized field is estimated by letting it interact with a two-level atom. For both metrological scenarios, we focus on the quantum Fisher information (QFI) of the reduced state of the atomic probe. In the semi-classical Rabi model, the QFI is independent of the field amplitude and grows quadratically with the interaction time $τ$. In contrast, when the atom interacts with a single coherent mode of the field, the QFI is bounded by 4, a constant dictated by the non-orthogonality of coherent states. We find that this bound can only be approached in the vacuum limit. In the limit of large amplitude $α$, the QFI is found to attain its maximal value $1.47$ at $τ=O(1)$ and $τ=O(α^2)$, and also shows periodic revivals at much later times. When the atom interacts with a sequence of coherent states, the QFI can increase with time but is bounded to scale linearly due to the production of entanglement between the atom and the radiation (back-action), except in the limit where the number of modes and their total energy diverge. Finally, in the continuous-field limit, where the atom interacts with a continuous source of weak coherent states, this back-action can be simply interpreted as spontaneous emission; we find that the optimal atomic QFI rate is finite, depends on the source intensity, and is upper bounded by the constant rate at which the QFI is emitted by the radiation source.

Quantum sensing of a quantum field

Abstract

Estimating a classical parameter encoded in the Hamiltonian of a quantum probe is a fundamental and well-understood task in quantum metrology. A textbook example is the estimation of a classical field's amplitude using a two-level probe, as described by the semi-classical Rabi model. In this work, we explore the fully quantum analogue, where the amplitude of a coherent quantized field is estimated by letting it interact with a two-level atom. For both metrological scenarios, we focus on the quantum Fisher information (QFI) of the reduced state of the atomic probe. In the semi-classical Rabi model, the QFI is independent of the field amplitude and grows quadratically with the interaction time . In contrast, when the atom interacts with a single coherent mode of the field, the QFI is bounded by 4, a constant dictated by the non-orthogonality of coherent states. We find that this bound can only be approached in the vacuum limit. In the limit of large amplitude , the QFI is found to attain its maximal value at and , and also shows periodic revivals at much later times. When the atom interacts with a sequence of coherent states, the QFI can increase with time but is bounded to scale linearly due to the production of entanglement between the atom and the radiation (back-action), except in the limit where the number of modes and their total energy diverge. Finally, in the continuous-field limit, where the atom interacts with a continuous source of weak coherent states, this back-action can be simply interpreted as spontaneous emission; we find that the optimal atomic QFI rate is finite, depends on the source intensity, and is upper bounded by the constant rate at which the QFI is emitted by the radiation source.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 42 sections, 170 equations, 6 figures.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: From top to bottom: the coherence $x_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g/e)}$ and the population $z_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g/e)}$ of the atomic state as function of time $\tau$ (x-axis) and coherent state amplitude $\alpha$ (y-axis). The left column corresponds to the ground state, and the right to the excited. The guidelines represent the different "revival" times derived analytically in the asymptotic limit (see Appendix \ref{['app: large alpha limit']}).
  • Figure 2: From top to bottom: the purity $\mathcal{P}[\rho_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g/e)}]$ and the quantum Fisher information ${\rm QFI}[\rho_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g/e)}]$ of the atomic state as function of time $\tau$ (x-axis) and coherent state amplitude $\alpha$ (y-axis). The left column corresponds to the ground state, and the right to the excited. The guidelines represent the different "revival" times derived analytically in the asymptotic limit (see Appendix \ref{['app: large alpha limit']}). $1-\mathcal{P}[\rho_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g/e)}]$ measures the atom-field entanglement. The white patches that appear for small values of $\alpha$ in the bottom figures are due to the state being pure close to $\alpha = 0$; it is a numerical artifact.
  • Figure 3: The ${\rm QFI}[\rho_{\tau=1|\alpha}^{(g/e)}]$ of the ground (full line) and excited (dashed line) initial state after an interaction with the coherent mode of duration $\tau=1$, as a function of $\alpha$. We see that it converges relatively fast to the asymptotic value $4/e\approx 1.47$.
  • Figure 4: The QFI$(\rho_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g)})$ of the atom (initialized in the ground state) as a function of the interaction time for $\alpha =100$. The local maxima at $\tau =1$ and $4\alpha^2$, as well as the sharp revivals for $\tau =O(\alpha)$ and $O(\alpha^3)$, are predicted by the asymptotic analysis discussed in the text. The inset gives the Fisher information ${\rm FI}_z(\rho_{\tau|\alpha}^{(g)})$ for the population measurement, which does not show the second maxima and the very late revivals.
  • Figure 5: (Left) The optimal QFI as a function of $\bar{\varepsilon}$ for the initial ground state (blue) and for the initial excited state (green). The dashed line corresponds to the steady QFI computed in Eq. \ref{['eq: steady-QFI']}. (Right) The optimal QFI rate as a function of $\bar{\varepsilon}$ for the initial ground state (blue) and for the initial excited state (green). The theoretical upper bound of 4 (also valid for adaptive processes with unlimited auxiliary entanglement) follows from Refs. sekatski2017quantumdemkowicz2017adaptivezhou2018achieving.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • proof