Table of Contents
Fetching ...

SU(N) integrals and tau functions

A. Yu. Orlov

TL;DR

This work develops a unified framework for solvable SU$(N)$ multi-matrix models tied to embedded graphs, where corner matrices and their monodromies encode the spectral data driving the partition functions. By leveraging dressing by group elements and Schur-function (and Mac) identities, the authors derive explicit integral relations for $G\in\{GL(N),U(N),SU(N)\}$ and mixed ensembles, expressing correlators as sums over partitions and, in favorable cases, as $\tau$-functions of KP, 2KP, or BKP hierarchies. The KP case yields determinant forms, while BKP leads to Pfaffian expressions built from generalized hypergeometric functions, with hypergeometric $\tau$-functions arising under Mac-type restrictions and vertex-geometry constraints. They also provide a fermionic (2KP) construction for $SU(N)$ integrals and highlight when SU$(N)$ integrals can be represented as $\tau$-functions, clarifying the role of vertex topology and monodromy spectra. Overall, the paper links graph-based multi-matrix ensembles to integrable hierarchies, extending solvable models to SU$(N)$ and mixed groups and enabling explicit tau-function representations through spectral data and Mac relations.

Abstract

We present a family of solvable multi-matrix models associated with an arbitrary embedded graph $Γ$ with a single vertex. The graph with $n$ edges is equipped with $2n$ corner matrices. The partition function of each member of the family depends on the set of eigenvalues of monodromies of corner matrices around the vertices of the dual graph $Γ^*$ and sets of parameters attached to each vertex of $Γ$. We select the cases where the partition function of a model is a tau function of KP, 2KP and BKP hiearachies. We compare integrals over ${U}(N)$ and over ${SU}(N)$ groups. In $U(N)$ case there is no restriction on the number of vertices of $Γ$. We also consider mixed ensembles of matrices from $GL(N),U(N)$ and $SU(N)$.

SU(N) integrals and tau functions

TL;DR

This work develops a unified framework for solvable SU multi-matrix models tied to embedded graphs, where corner matrices and their monodromies encode the spectral data driving the partition functions. By leveraging dressing by group elements and Schur-function (and Mac) identities, the authors derive explicit integral relations for and mixed ensembles, expressing correlators as sums over partitions and, in favorable cases, as -functions of KP, 2KP, or BKP hierarchies. The KP case yields determinant forms, while BKP leads to Pfaffian expressions built from generalized hypergeometric functions, with hypergeometric -functions arising under Mac-type restrictions and vertex-geometry constraints. They also provide a fermionic (2KP) construction for integrals and highlight when SU integrals can be represented as -functions, clarifying the role of vertex topology and monodromy spectra. Overall, the paper links graph-based multi-matrix ensembles to integrable hierarchies, extending solvable models to SU and mixed groups and enabling explicit tau-function representations through spectral data and Mac relations.

Abstract

We present a family of solvable multi-matrix models associated with an arbitrary embedded graph with a single vertex. The graph with edges is equipped with corner matrices. The partition function of each member of the family depends on the set of eigenvalues of monodromies of corner matrices around the vertices of the dual graph and sets of parameters attached to each vertex of . We select the cases where the partition function of a model is a tau function of KP, 2KP and BKP hiearachies. We compare integrals over and over groups. In case there is no restriction on the number of vertices of . We also consider mixed ensembles of matrices from and .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 8 theorems, 56 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

For $G=U(N)$ and $G=GL(N)$ and for a set of partitions $\lambda=\lambda^{(1)},\lambda^{(2)},\dots,\lambda^{(V)}$ we get where We also have the dual relation:

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Remark 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • Proposition 3.3
  • Proposition C.1
  • Lemma C.1