Ledrappier-Young entropy formula for $C^1$ diffeomorphisms with dominated splitting Part 1: Unstable entropy formula and invariance principle
Shaobo Gan, Yao Tong, Jiagang Yang
TL;DR
The paper extends the Ledrappier–Young entropy framework to $C^1$ diffeomorphisms with dominated splitting, proving that when the center bundle is one-dimensional, the unstable entropy equals the metric entropy for ergodic measures and the center contributes no entropy. It overcomes lack of Lipschitz unstable holonomies by introducing fake foliations and establishing uniform Hölder holonomy, along with uncentered maximal-function techniques to obtain convergence arguments. A precise unstable entropy theory is developed with subordinate and quotient partitions, transverse metrics, and adapted partitions, enabling the main equality $h^u_m(f)=h_m(f)$ under dominated splitting and $\,\dim E^c\leq 1$. The results yield a $C^1$ invariance principle and various applications, including extensions of Avila–Viana type invariance results and entropy-measure classifications in the $C^1$ partially hyperbolic setting, notably for SPH$(M)$. Overall, the work paves the way for a $C^1$ Ledrappier–Young theory in the one-dimensional center case and lays groundwork for further Hölder-regularity relaxations in subsequent parts.
Abstract
We study the unstable entropy of $C^1$ diffeomorphisms with dominated splittings. Our main result shows that when the zero Lyapunov exponent has multiplicity one, the center direction contributes no entropy, and the unstable entropy coincides with the metric entropy. This extends the celebrated work of Ledrappier-Young [18] for $C^2$ diffeomorphisms to the $C^1$ setting under these assumptions. In particular, our results apply to $C^1$ diffeomorphisms away from homoclinic tangencies due to [20]. As consequences, we obtain several applications at $C^1$ regularity. The Avila-Viana invariance principle [7, 33] holds when the center is one-dimensional. Results on measures of maximal entropy due to Hertz-Hertz-Tahzibi-Ures [25], Tahzibi-Yang [33], and Ures-Viana-Yang-Yang [34, 35] also remain valid for $C^1$ diffeomorphisms.
