Conversational Agents in Behavioral Sleep Medicine: Designing Self-Report and Analytics Tools
Amama Mahmood, Bokyung Kim, Honghao Zhao, Molly E. Atwood, Luis F. Buenaver, Michael T. Smith, Chien-Ming Huang
TL;DR
The paper addresses the limitations of traditional sleep diaries in Behavioral Sleep Medicine by prototyping a large-language-model–driven, voice-based sleep diary and a specialist-facing analytics tool. Through a three-stage design—interviews with sleep specialists, iterative prototyping with design workshops, and focus groups—the authors derive design requirements and validate a multi-panel CA analytics interface that integrates both subjective diary data and objective metrics. Findings reveal potential to reduce patient and clinician burden, capture richer contextual information, and extend care beyond the clinic, while also highlighting risks related to LLM reliability and data privacy. The work offers concrete design implications, including cross-platform diary interactions, integrated data visualizations, AI-assisted analysis, and safe, clinician-guided patient engagement, with implications for at-home care and broader behavioral health contexts.
Abstract
The sleep diary is a widely used clinical tool for understanding and treating sleep disorders in Behavioral Sleep Medicine (BSM); however, low patient compliance and limited capture of contextual information constrain its effectiveness and leave specialists with an incomplete picture of patients' sleep-related behaviors. In this work, we explore conversational agents (CAs) as an alternative to traditional diary methods by designing a voice-based sleep diary and a specialist-facing analytics tool, and using them as design probes to understand how CAs might support BSM more broadly. Our multi-stage study with specialists comprised: (1) interviews to identify shortcomings of current text-based diaries, (2) iterative co-design of the conversational diary and analytics tool, and (3) focus groups to examine broader opportunities for CAs in BSM. This work offers empirical insights into how specialists envision CAs in clinical care and outlines design implications for integrating them into existing self-report practices and behavioral interventions.
