Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multiplicity Distributions and the Frontier between Soft and Hard Physics

H. R. Martins-Fontes, F. S. Navarra

TL;DR

High-level goal: explain shoulder structures in pp multiplicity distributions at the LHC by testing a two-component model grounded in QCD. Approach: use a k_T factorization framework to split soft and semihard contributions with a separation scale Λ, and fit a double NB distribution $P(n)=λ[αP(n,⟨n⟩_s,k_s)+(1-α)P(n,⟨n⟩_{sh},k_{sh})]$ with $dN/dy = dN_s/dy + dN_{sh}/dy$ and $⟨n⟩ = λ[α⟨n⟩_s+(1-α)⟨n⟩_{sh}]$. Key results show that $α$ decreases with energy, the NB parameters $k_s$ and $k_{sh}$ evolve with energy, the fits are robust to the separation scale Λ, and KNO scaling is sensitive to the pseudorapidity window, indicating distinct QCD dynamics across central and forward regions. Significance: provides a QCD-motivated, empirically robust framework linking soft and semihard production to multiplicity structure and paves the way for refined forward-physics modeling and deeper tests of QCD dynamics.

Abstract

The multiplicity distributions measured in proton proton collisions at the LHC exhibit interesting new features. One of them is the appearance of substructures, such as the so-called "shoulder" at large multiplicities. The most natural interpretation of this behavior is the existence of two production mechanisms. The final result is then a superposition of two distributions. In a previous publication we assumed that the two production mechanisms are soft and semihard partonics scatterings. In this work we further discuss this assumption and, in particular, we study the dependence of the results on the scale which separates soft from hard events.

Multiplicity Distributions and the Frontier between Soft and Hard Physics

TL;DR

High-level goal: explain shoulder structures in pp multiplicity distributions at the LHC by testing a two-component model grounded in QCD. Approach: use a k_T factorization framework to split soft and semihard contributions with a separation scale Λ, and fit a double NB distribution with and . Key results show that decreases with energy, the NB parameters and evolve with energy, the fits are robust to the separation scale Λ, and KNO scaling is sensitive to the pseudorapidity window, indicating distinct QCD dynamics across central and forward regions. Significance: provides a QCD-motivated, empirically robust framework linking soft and semihard production to multiplicity structure and paves the way for refined forward-physics modeling and deeper tests of QCD dynamics.

Abstract

The multiplicity distributions measured in proton proton collisions at the LHC exhibit interesting new features. One of them is the appearance of substructures, such as the so-called "shoulder" at large multiplicities. The most natural interpretation of this behavior is the existence of two production mechanisms. The final result is then a superposition of two distributions. In a previous publication we assumed that the two production mechanisms are soft and semihard partonics scatterings. In this work we further discuss this assumption and, in particular, we study the dependence of the results on the scale which separates soft from hard events.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 10 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Figures (2)

  • Figure S1: Multiplicity distributions measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =7$ TeV. The data points are fitted with Eq. (\ref{['DNBD']}) taking fixed values of the cutoff $\Lambda$. (a) $\Lambda=1$ GeV. (b) $\Lambda=1.4$ GeV. (c) $\Lambda=2$ GeV.
  • Figure S2: Parameter $\alpha$ as a function of the energy $\sqrt{s}$ for different pseudorapidity windows. The points are obtained from fitting the data and have been multiplied by different factors, for a better visualization. The lines are just to guide the eyes. In each panel the different curves refer to different pseudorapidity windows $-\eta_c < \eta < + \eta_c$. In each panel the value of the cutoff $\Lambda$ was fixed. (a) $\Lambda=1$ GeV. (b) $\Lambda=1.4$ GeV. (c) $\Lambda=2$ GeV.