Reducts of fuzzy contexts: Formal concept analysis vs. rough set theory
Yuxu Chen, Jing Liu, Lili Shen, Xiaoye Tang
TL;DR
This paper investigates reducts of fuzzy contexts valued in a complete residuated lattice $L$ within formal concept analysis (FCA) and rough set theory (RST). It develops streamlined, parallel notions of reducts in both FCA and RST using infomorphisms and comparison maps, and proves the central result that FCA- and RST-reducts are interdefinable via negation if and only if the lattice $L$ satisfies the law of double negation, i.e., $ eg eg a=1_L$ for all $a$. The work provides concrete reducibility criteria, a suite of examples illustrating when the equivalence holds or fails, and two algorithms to verify reducts in practice. These findings clarify when FCA and RST techniques align in fuzzy data analysis and offer practical tools for canonical reduction of fuzzy contexts.
Abstract
We postulate the intuitive idea of reducts of fuzzy contexts based on formal concept analysis and rough set theory. For a complete residuated lattice $L$, it is shown that reducts of $L$-contexts in formal concept analysis are interdefinable with reducts of $L$-contexts in rough set theory via negation if, and only if, $L$ satisfies the law of double negation.
