Consensus-Based Optimization Beyond Finite-Time Analysis
Pascal Bianchi, Radu-Alexandru Dragomir, Victor Priser
TL;DR
The paper analyzes a Consensus-Based Optimization algorithm with fixed, small noise in the long-time regime for non-convex optimization. It develops a mean-field framework via a quantitative Laplace principle that links the consensus point to a proximal operator, yielding exponential convergence to x^* up to an O(1/√α) bias, and provides a clipped mean-field SDE to obtain uniform moment bounds. For finite numbers of particles, a block-wise, time-window analysis delivers explicit long-time error bounds for each particle and proves consistency of the global best toward x^*. The results rely on propagation of chaos, Wasserstein-2 control, and discretization error analysis to establish long-time convergence and tight bounds as n, k → ∞, with explicit dependence on α and the step sequence η_k, offering practical guidance for using CBO in long-horizon optimization.
Abstract
We analyze a zeroth-order particle algorithm for the global optimization of a non-convex function, focusing on a variant of Consensus-Based Optimization (CBO) with small but fixed noise intensity. Unlike most previous studies restricted to finite horizons, we investigate its long-time behavior with fixed parameters. In the mean-field limit, a quantitative Laplace principle shows exponential convergence to a neighborhood of the minimizer x * . For finitely many particles, a block-wise analysis yields explicit error bounds: individual particles achieve long-time consistency near x * , and the global best particle converge to x * . The proof technique combines a quantitative Laplace principle with block-wise control of Wasserstein distances, avoiding the exponential blow-up typical of Gr{ö}nwall-based estimates.
