Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lowering the Horizon on Dark Energy: A Late-Time Response to Early Solutions for the Hubble Tension

Tal Adi

Abstract

We present a model-independent null test of the late-time cosmological response to a reduced sound horizon, as typically required by early-universe solutions to the Hubble tension. In this approach, we phenomenologically impose a shorter sound horizon without modeling early-universe physics to isolate its impact on late-time dark energy inference. Using baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), supernovae (SN), big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), and local $H_0$ data, while explicitly avoiding CMB anisotropies, we examine how this calibration shift propagates into constraints on the dark energy equation of state. We find that lowering $r_d$ systematically drives the $w_0$-$w_a$ posterior toward less dynamical, quintessence-like behavior, bringing it closer to $Λ$CDM. This result underscores that some of the apparent evidence for evolving or phantom-like dark energy may reflect early-universe assumptions rather than genuine late-time dynamics. More broadly, our analysis highlights the importance of carefully disentangling calibration effects from physical evolution in interpreting forthcoming results from DESI and future surveys.

Lowering the Horizon on Dark Energy: A Late-Time Response to Early Solutions for the Hubble Tension

Abstract

We present a model-independent null test of the late-time cosmological response to a reduced sound horizon, as typically required by early-universe solutions to the Hubble tension. In this approach, we phenomenologically impose a shorter sound horizon without modeling early-universe physics to isolate its impact on late-time dark energy inference. Using baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), supernovae (SN), big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), and local data, while explicitly avoiding CMB anisotropies, we examine how this calibration shift propagates into constraints on the dark energy equation of state. We find that lowering systematically drives the - posterior toward less dynamical, quintessence-like behavior, bringing it closer to CDM. This result underscores that some of the apparent evidence for evolving or phantom-like dark energy may reflect early-universe assumptions rather than genuine late-time dynamics. More broadly, our analysis highlights the importance of carefully disentangling calibration effects from physical evolution in interpreting forthcoming results from DESI and future surveys.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 5 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Posterior distributions of cosmological parameters with (right panel) and without (left panel) the $r_d$ prior. Each triangle plot shows the 68% and 95% confidence regions for key parameters using the baseline combinations of BAO, BBN, and SN data. Shaded bands indicate the SH0ES Riess:2021jrx confidence regions for $H_0$, and black dashed lines guide the eye to $w_0 = -1$ and $w_a = 0$. The inclusion of a reduced sound horizon prior shifts $H_0$ to higher values and induces correlated changes in the CPL parameters ($w_0$, $w_a$), reflecting the late-time response required to maintain consistency with BAO and SN observations.
  • Figure 2: Evolution of the best-fit values of $H_0$, $w_0$, and $w_a$ as functions of the imposed sound horizon $r_d$, normalized to the Planck 2018 best-fit value. The results are shown for the BAO+BBN+SN+rs dataset combination. The shaded regions indicate the phantom regime ($w\le-1$), while the red dashed line marks the crossing of the phantom divide.
  • Figure 3: Comparison of DE EoS constraints obtained with the CPL parameterization and a binning reconstruction approach DESI:2025fii, using BAO+BBN+SN+rs data. The solid red curve indicates the best-fit $w(z)$ derived from $w_0$ and $w_a$, with shaded regions denoting the $1\sigma$ and $2\sigma$ uncertainties. Results from the binning reconstruction are shown in blue: the horizontal bars correspond to the fixed bin size and the vertical bars correspond to $1\sigma$ uncertainties. Gray contours represent the 1D posterior for the binned parameters. The green dashed curve and band show the CPL fit using the DESI DR2 dataset (BAO+CMB+DESY5) DESI:2025zgx, reproduced for comparison. The horizontal gray dashed line denotes the $\Lambda$CDM expectation.