Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Generalization of the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Model for Quantum Ferromagnetism

Isao Maruyama, Shin Miyahara

Abstract

We study a spin-$S$ ferromagnetic model with exactly-written ground states, known as the partially-magnetized valence bond solid (VBS) states with magnetization $m=(S-1)/S$, which is a ferromagnetic generalization of the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki model. We find that the VBS state and an antiferromagnetic ground state with magnetization $m=0$ are degenerate for $S=3/2$ and $S=2$ by using the Lanczos method and the density matrix renormalization group method (DMRG). However, increasing $S$, the magnetization of the ground states is uniquely determined as the fraction $m=(S-1)/S$. This is not just a ferromagnet, but a quantum ferromagnet due to quantum entanglement inherent in VBS states. In the low-energy excitation spectrum, we find the coexistence of the Haldane gap and Goldstone-like ferromagnetic magnon excitation. This ``magnetic chimera'' clearly appears under a finite magnetic field. Finally, we discuss an application to the measurement-based quantum computation and an extension of the Haldane's conjecture.

Generalization of the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Model for Quantum Ferromagnetism

Abstract

We study a spin- ferromagnetic model with exactly-written ground states, known as the partially-magnetized valence bond solid (VBS) states with magnetization , which is a ferromagnetic generalization of the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki model. We find that the VBS state and an antiferromagnetic ground state with magnetization are degenerate for and by using the Lanczos method and the density matrix renormalization group method (DMRG). However, increasing , the magnetization of the ground states is uniquely determined as the fraction . This is not just a ferromagnet, but a quantum ferromagnet due to quantum entanglement inherent in VBS states. In the low-energy excitation spectrum, we find the coexistence of the Haldane gap and Goldstone-like ferromagnetic magnon excitation. This ``magnetic chimera'' clearly appears under a finite magnetic field. Finally, we discuss an application to the measurement-based quantum computation and an extension of the Haldane's conjecture.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 43 equations, 9 figures, 1 table.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: (Color online)Schematic picture of the ground states (a) in traditional spin-$S$ chain models and (b) in "quantum" ferromagnetism of spin-$S$ chain models. Properties about total spin $S_{\rm tot}$ of the ground states and low energy excitation $\Delta E_\pm$ are also summarized. For $\Delta E_+$, the spin-1/2 antiferromagnet (AF) has $\Delta E_+\propto |q|$, i.e., des Cloizeaux-Pearson modePR.128.2131 while the spin-1 AF has the Haldane gap $\Delta E_+>0$PRL.50.1153. On the other hand, $\Delta E_-\propto q^2$ is Goldstone-type gapless one-magnon modeISBN.0521551439.
  • Figure 2: (Color online)Ferromagnetic AKLT state ${\left|\Phi\right\rangle_{\!}}$ in Eq. (\ref{['VBS']}) written with spin-singlets ${\left|\phi_s\right\rangle_{\!}}_{i,i+1}$ and background ferromagnetic Ising states ${\left|S-1\right\rangle_{\!}}_{i,F}$. Spin-$S$ operator $\hbox{\boldmath $\hat{S}$}_i$ at the $i$-th site is decomposed into spin-$(S-1)$ operator $\hbox{\boldmath $\hat{S}$}_{i,F}$ and two spin-1/2 operators $\hbox{\boldmath $\hat{s}$}_{i,L}$, $\hbox{\boldmath $\hat{s}$}_{i,R}$. This is identical to Oshikawa's stateJPCM.4.7469 and is depicted in the bottom panel of Fig. \ref{['figV']} (b).
  • Figure 3: (Color online)$E_{S_{\rm tot}=0}$ and $S_{\rm tot}$ as a function of the number of sweeps in the finite size method for $S=2$, and $N=24$ obtained by DMRG with $\chi=100$. All data points are positive: $E_{S_{\rm tot}=0} > 0$ and $S_{\rm tot}>0$. The unit of energy $E_{+,N=4}$ will be given by Eq. (\ref{['def:scale']}) in the next section § \ref{['sec:Gp']}.
  • Figure 4: (Color online)System-size $N$ dependence of the Haldane gap $\Delta E_+=E_+$ of ${\hat{H}}^{(S)}(\beta_S)$ defined in Eq. (\ref{['def:DeltaE+']}) with the unit of energy $E_{+,N=4}$ in Eq. (\ref{['def:scale']}). Using ${\hat{H}}^{(S=1)}(\beta_1)\propto \hat{H}_{0}^{(S=1)}$, the $S=1$ data (solid line) was obtained from a table in a previous studyPRB.88.245118 and the $S=1$ data points without a solid line were calculated by DMRG additionally.
  • Figure 5: (Color online)Low energy excitation $\Delta E_{-,q}=E_{-,q}$ as a function $q$ with $\Delta S=-1$ ($S_{{\rm tot}}=N(S-1)-1$), obtained using the Lanczos method. For each $S$, larger point indicates a larger system size $N$. The solid lines are fitted curves using the dispersion function in Eq. (\ref{['def:DeltaE-']}). $E_{+,N=4}$ is the unit of energy in Eq. (\ref{['def:scale']}).
  • ...and 4 more figures