Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The impact of kinetic and global effects on ballooning 2nd stable pedestals of conventional and low aspect ratio tokamaks

M. S. Anastopoulos Tzanis, M. Yang, A. Kleiner, J. F. Parisi, G. M. Staebler, P. B. Snyder

TL;DR

This paper addresses the need for reactor-relevant pedestal predictions beyond the traditional EPED framework by incorporating kinetic ballooning effects and global 2nd-stability dynamics. It introduces the Gyro-Fluid System (GFS) to determine KBM thresholds and couples these with ELITE-based global MHD stability to refine the KBM constraint in EPED. The results show that GFS- and ELITE-derived scalings yield better agreement with DIII-D and NSTX pedestal data, especially in low aspect ratio devices where kinetic and global effects are pronounced. These developments enhance the predictive capability of pedestal models for future fusion reactors by accurately capturing both local kinetic thresholds and nonlocal global stability limits.

Abstract

The EPED model [P.B. Snyder et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 103016] had success describing the pedestals of the Type-I ELM and QH-mode operations in conventional tokamaks, by combining kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) and peeling-ballooning (PB) constraints. Within EPED, the KBM constraint is usually approximated by the ideal ballooning mode (IBM) stability threshold. It has been noted that quantitative differences between local ideal MHD and gyro-kinetic (GK) ballooning stability can be larger at low aspect ratio. KBM critical pedestals are consistent with observations in initial studies on conventional and spherical tokamaks. In this work, the application of a reduced model for the calculation of the kinetic ballooning stability boundary is presented based on a novel and newly developed Gyro-Fluid System (GFS) code [G.M. Staebler et al 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 102501]. GFS is observed to capture KBMs in DIII-D as well as the NSTX(-U) pedestals, opening a route integrating this model into EPED. Finally, high-n global ballooning modes are observed to limit the access to the local 2nd stability and thus provide a transport mechanism that constrains the width evolution with beta_p,ped. The high-n global ballooning stability is approximated by its ideal MHD analogue using ELITE. It is shown that nearly local high-n with k_y*rho_s~1/2 modes can provide a proxy for the critical beta_p,ped when a 2nd stable access exists on DIII-D plasmas. The use of GFS and ELITE scaling in EPED provided an improved agreement in comparison to EPED1 with DIII-D pedestal data.

The impact of kinetic and global effects on ballooning 2nd stable pedestals of conventional and low aspect ratio tokamaks

TL;DR

This paper addresses the need for reactor-relevant pedestal predictions beyond the traditional EPED framework by incorporating kinetic ballooning effects and global 2nd-stability dynamics. It introduces the Gyro-Fluid System (GFS) to determine KBM thresholds and couples these with ELITE-based global MHD stability to refine the KBM constraint in EPED. The results show that GFS- and ELITE-derived scalings yield better agreement with DIII-D and NSTX pedestal data, especially in low aspect ratio devices where kinetic and global effects are pronounced. These developments enhance the predictive capability of pedestal models for future fusion reactors by accurately capturing both local kinetic thresholds and nonlocal global stability limits.

Abstract

The EPED model [P.B. Snyder et al 2011 Nucl. Fusion 51 103016] had success describing the pedestals of the Type-I ELM and QH-mode operations in conventional tokamaks, by combining kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) and peeling-ballooning (PB) constraints. Within EPED, the KBM constraint is usually approximated by the ideal ballooning mode (IBM) stability threshold. It has been noted that quantitative differences between local ideal MHD and gyro-kinetic (GK) ballooning stability can be larger at low aspect ratio. KBM critical pedestals are consistent with observations in initial studies on conventional and spherical tokamaks. In this work, the application of a reduced model for the calculation of the kinetic ballooning stability boundary is presented based on a novel and newly developed Gyro-Fluid System (GFS) code [G.M. Staebler et al 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 102501]. GFS is observed to capture KBMs in DIII-D as well as the NSTX(-U) pedestals, opening a route integrating this model into EPED. Finally, high-n global ballooning modes are observed to limit the access to the local 2nd stability and thus provide a transport mechanism that constrains the width evolution with beta_p,ped. The high-n global ballooning stability is approximated by its ideal MHD analogue using ELITE. It is shown that nearly local high-n with k_y*rho_s~1/2 modes can provide a proxy for the critical beta_p,ped when a 2nd stable access exists on DIII-D plasmas. The use of GFS and ELITE scaling in EPED provided an improved agreement in comparison to EPED1 with DIII-D pedestal data.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 9 figures, 1 table.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: a) The $\hat{s}-\alpha$ diagram for the IBM stability boundary and KBM stability boundary as calculated from GFS. b) Comparison of normalized growth rate $\gamma/\omega_s$ between GFS and CGYRO with varying temperature gradient normalized length scale $L_T$ for $k_y\rho_s=0.1$.
  • Figure 2: a) Comparison of the pedestal width scaling with $\beta_{p,ped}$ between DIII-D #131999 and NSTX #139047 and b) $\hat{s}-\alpha$ kinetic ballooning stability boundary at the middle of the pedestal between DIII-D and NSTX plasmas. The solid lines represent the ideal ballooning stability boundary.
  • Figure 3: a) Comparison of the pedestal width $\Delta_{\psi_N}$ scaling with $\beta_{p,ped}$ and b) the $\hat{s}-\alpha$ stability boundary at the middle of the pedestal considering different toroidal magnetic field $B_T$ on the geometric axis for NSTX #139047.
  • Figure 4: a) Comparison of the pedestal width $\Delta_{\psi_N}$ scaling with $\beta_{p,ped}$ and b) the $\hat{s}-\alpha$ stability boundary at the middle of the pedestal considering different aspect ratio $A$ for NSTX #139047.
  • Figure 5: a) Comparison of the pedestal width $\Delta_{\psi_N}$ scaling with $\beta_{p,ped}$ and b) the $\hat{s}-\alpha$ stability boundary at the middle of the pedestal considering different elongation $\kappa$ for NSTX #139047.
  • ...and 4 more figures