A new proof of non-Cohen-Macaulayness of Bertin's example
Takuma Seno
TL;DR
The paper addresses Bertin's classic example of a Noetherian UFD that is not Cohen-Macaulay and provides a new ring-theoretic proof based on Hilbert-series techniques and Gorenstein criteria. It leverages Stanley's palindromic condition for Hilbert series and Braun's invariant-theory results to derive a contradiction under the assumption of Cohen-Macaulayness in characteristic two. The main contribution is a structurally different proof of non-Cohen-Macaulayness for Bertin's invariant ring and a generalization to a broader class of permutation-group actions with no pseudoreflections. This work clarifies the role of Gorensteinness and modular phenomena in invariant theory and offers a general framework for detecting CM failures via Hilbert-series palindromicity.
Abstract
Bertin's example is famous as the first known Noetherian UFD that is not Cohen-Macaulay. In the example, she employed a ring of invariants and proved that the ring is not Cohen-Macaulay by calculating a homogeneous system of parameter and generators of it. In this paper, we give a new proof by arguments on ring theoretic properties.
