Can Language Models Handle a Non-Gregorian Calendar? The Case of the Japanese wareki
Mutsumi Sasaki, Go Kamoda, Ryosuke Takahashi, Kosuke Sato, Kentaro Inui, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Benjamin Heinzerling
TL;DR
This work investigates whether language models can handle the Japanese wareki, a non-Gregorian calendar, by constructing three targeted tasks (CalendarConversion, JapaneseCalendarArithmetic, BirthYearRecall) and evaluating English-centric, Japanese-centric, and frontier models. The study finds that while Japanese-centric and frontier models can perform basic calendar conversions with high accuracy, they struggle with era-bound arithmetic and birth-year recall, with English-centric models showing substantial failures and cross- calendar biases influencing results. Error analysis points to corpus frequency of wareki expressions and a Gregorian bias in knowledge as key drivers of performance gaps, underscoring the need for culture-specific temporal reasoning in LMs. The findings emphasize the importance of extending temporal reasoning benchmarks beyond the Gregorian calendar to improve cultural competence and cross-cultural NLP tasks in real-world settings.
Abstract
Temporal reasoning and knowledge are essential capabilities for language models (LMs). While much prior work has analyzed and improved temporal reasoning in LMs, most studies have focused solely on the Gregorian calendar. However, many non-Gregorian systems, such as the Japanese, Hijri, and Hebrew calendars, are in active use and reflect culturally grounded conceptions of time. If and how well current LMs can accurately handle such non-Gregorian calendars has not been evaluated so far. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of how well language models handle one such non-Gregorian system: the Japanese wareki. We create datasets that require temporal knowledge and reasoning in using wareki dates. Evaluating open and closed LMs, we find that some models can perform calendar conversions, but GPT-4o, Deepseek V3, and even Japanese-centric models struggle with Japanese calendar arithmetic and knowledge involving wareki dates. Error analysis suggests corpus frequency of Japanese calendar expressions and a Gregorian bias in the model's knowledge as possible explanations. Our results show the importance of developing LMs that are better equipped for culture-specific tasks such as calendar understanding.
