Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Detection of ultracold neutrons with powdered scintillator screens

M. Krivos, N. C. Floyd, C. L. Morris, Z. Tang, M. Blatnik, S. M. Clayton, C. B. Cude-Woods, A. Fratangelo, A. T. Holley, D. E. Hooks, T. M. Ito, C. -Y. Liu, M. Makela, M. R. Martinez, A. S. C. Navazo, C., M. O'Shaughnessy, R. W. Pattie, E. L. Renner, T. A. Sandborn, T. J. Schaub, M. Singh, I. L. Smythe, F. W. Uhrich, N. K. Washecheck, Z. Wang, A. R. Young

TL;DR

The paper tackles the limitations of ZnS:Ag/10B ultracold neutron detectors, namely long decay times and phosphorescence, by evaluating two faster scintillators, YAP:Ce and LYSO:Ce, fabricated as powder-based screens with a thin $^{10}$B coating. YAP:Ce exhibits a decay time of about $28$ ns and yields roughly $20 ext{%}$ higher UCN counts per unit area than ZnS:Ag, with $60 ext{%}$ less phosphorescence after $2$ days, while LYSO:Ce shows a $32$ ns decay but significantly higher phosphorescence and about $20 ext{%}$ fewer UCN counts due to lower light output linked to its emission spectrum and Lutetium-related radioactivity. The authors attribute the differences in performance to emission spectra and convolution with the photomultiplier’s quantum efficiency, demonstrating that YAP:Ce is the more favorable replacement for high-rate UCN experiments, whereas ZnS:Ag remains suitable for lower-rate scenarios and LYSO:Ce is less advantageous due to phosphorescence. These findings inform detector design choices for precision UCN measurements and high-count-rate applications.

Abstract

Zinc sulfide (ZnS:Ag) scintillators coated with a thin 10B layer are widely used for ultracold neutron (UCN) detection, but their application is limited by long decay times and significant phosphorescence. We investigated two possible replacement scintillators: yttrium aluminum perovskite (YAP:Ce) and lutetium ttrium orthosilicate (LYSO:Ce). Both exhibit decay times on the order of 30-40 ns, which can help reduce dead time in high-count-rate experiments. YAP:Ce showed approximately 60% lower phosphorescence than ZnS:Ag after 2 days and detected about 20% more UCN. In contrast, LYSO:Ce exhibited higher phosphorescence and produced fewer UCN counts compared to both ZnS:Ag and YAP:Ce. While both tested scintillators are capable UCN detectors, YAP:Ce consistently outperformed LYSO:Ce across all measured performance metrics.

Detection of ultracold neutrons with powdered scintillator screens

TL;DR

The paper tackles the limitations of ZnS:Ag/10B ultracold neutron detectors, namely long decay times and phosphorescence, by evaluating two faster scintillators, YAP:Ce and LYSO:Ce, fabricated as powder-based screens with a thin B coating. YAP:Ce exhibits a decay time of about ns and yields roughly higher UCN counts per unit area than ZnS:Ag, with less phosphorescence after days, while LYSO:Ce shows a ns decay but significantly higher phosphorescence and about fewer UCN counts due to lower light output linked to its emission spectrum and Lutetium-related radioactivity. The authors attribute the differences in performance to emission spectra and convolution with the photomultiplier’s quantum efficiency, demonstrating that YAP:Ce is the more favorable replacement for high-rate UCN experiments, whereas ZnS:Ag remains suitable for lower-rate scenarios and LYSO:Ce is less advantageous due to phosphorescence. These findings inform detector design choices for precision UCN measurements and high-count-rate applications.

Abstract

Zinc sulfide (ZnS:Ag) scintillators coated with a thin 10B layer are widely used for ultracold neutron (UCN) detection, but their application is limited by long decay times and significant phosphorescence. We investigated two possible replacement scintillators: yttrium aluminum perovskite (YAP:Ce) and lutetium ttrium orthosilicate (LYSO:Ce). Both exhibit decay times on the order of 30-40 ns, which can help reduce dead time in high-count-rate experiments. YAP:Ce showed approximately 60% lower phosphorescence than ZnS:Ag after 2 days and detected about 20% more UCN. In contrast, LYSO:Ce exhibited higher phosphorescence and produced fewer UCN counts compared to both ZnS:Ag and YAP:Ce. While both tested scintillators are capable UCN detectors, YAP:Ce consistently outperformed LYSO:Ce across all measured performance metrics.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 8 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Cross-sectional scan of a LYSO:Ce screen. The scintillator crystal surface layer is indicated between the red arrows; the numbers adjacent to the arrows denote the layer thickness. The layer beneath the crystals corresponds to the adhesive sheet onto which the crystals are deposited.
  • Figure 2: Pulse height of an average waveform from ZnS:Ag (blue), YAP:Ce (red), and LYSO:Ce (green). Solid lines represent scintillator activation with 5.5 MeV alphas from $^{241}\mathrm{Am}$ while dashed lines represent UCN capture on $^{10}\mathrm{B}$.
  • Figure 3: Phosphorescence counts from ZnS:Ag (blue), YAP:Ce (red), and LYSO:Ce (green).
  • Figure 4: Experimental setup used in Sec. \ref{['sec:ucn_detector']}. The gray-filled region inside the stainless-steel guide indicates where UCN are present when the gate valve is open. The dotted lines in front of the PMTs mark the positions of the tempered-glass windows with attached scintillators.
  • Figure 5: ZnS:Ag pulse-integral spectra for signal (blue) and background (violet) measurements. Events below 300 ADC$\cdot$ns are dominated by background and ZnS:Ag retriggering, while the increasing counts above 300 ADC$\cdot$ns correspond to genuine UCN events.
  • ...and 3 more figures