Topological characterization of phase transitions and critical edge states in one-dimensional non-Hermitian systems with sublattice symmetry
Longwen Zhou, Rujia Jing, Shenlin Wu
TL;DR
This work addresses how to characterize topology in 1D non-Hermitian systems with sublattice symmetry at both gapped and gapless transitions. It introduces two characteristic functions $P(z)=g(z)/f(z)$ and $Q(z)=f(z)g(z)$, derives winding numbers $W_1$ and $W_2$ from zeros/poles inside the generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ), and defines a bulk invariant $W=(W_1+W_2)/2$ together with edge counting $N_0=|W_1+W_2|=2|W|$, applicable to both Bloch and non-Bloch descriptions. The theory is applied to non-Hermitian SSH chains, showing how $W_1$, $W_2$, and $W$ classify gapped phases, gapless phase boundaries, and topological phase transitions, including transitions without bulk-gap closing and the emergence of critical edge states. The results reveal non-Hermitian-induced topological criticality (gSPT-like behavior) protected by sublattice symmetry, with bulk-edge correspondence $N_0=2|W|$ extending to gapless regimes and potentially guiding experimental realizations in photonic, acoustic, or electronic simulators.
Abstract
Critical edge states appear at the bulk gap closing points of topological transitions. Their emergence signify the existence of topologically nontrivial critical points, whose descriptions fall outside the scope of gapped topological matter. In this work, we reveal and characterize topological critical points and critical edge states in non-Hermitian systems. By applying the Cauchy's argument principle to two characteristic functions of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, we obtain a pair of winding numbers, whose combination yields a complete description of gapped and gapless topological phases in one-dimensional, two-band non-Hermitian systems with sublattice symmetry. Focusing on a broad class of non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, we demonstrate the applicability of our theory for characterizing gapless symmetry-protected topological phases, topologically distinct critical points, phase transitions along non-Hermitian phase boundaries and their associated topological edge modes. Our findings not only generalize the concepts of topologically nontrivial critical points and critical edge modes to non-Hermitian setups, but also yield additional insights for analyzing topological transitions and bulk-edge correspondence in open systems.
