Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Deep Unfolding with Approximated Computations for Rapid Optimization

Dvir Avrahami, Amit Milstein, Caroline Chaux, Tirza Routtenberg, Nir Shlezinger

TL;DR

This paper introduces a learned optimization framework that jointly tackles iteration count and per-iteration complexity, and demonstrates the effectiveness of the method on two representative problems: hybrid beamforming and robust principal component analysis.

Abstract

Optimization-based solvers play a central role in a wide range of signal processing and communication tasks. However, their applicability in latency-sensitive systems is limited by the sequential nature of iterative methods and the high computational cost per iteration. While deep unfolding has emerged as a powerful paradigm for converting iterative algorithms into learned models that operate with a fixed number of iterations, it does not inherently address the cost of each iteration. In this paper, we introduce a learned optimization framework that jointly tackles iteration count and per-iteration complexity. Our approach is based on unfolding a fixed number of optimization steps, replacing selected iterations with low-complexity approximated computations, and learning extended hyperparameters from data to compensate for the introduced approximations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on two representative problems: (i) hybrid beamforming; and (ii) robust principal component analysis. These fundamental case studies show that our learned approximated optimizers can achieve state-of-the-art performance while reducing computational complexity by over three orders of magnitude. Our results highlight the potential of our approach to enable rapid, interpretable, and efficient decision-making in real-time systems.

Deep Unfolding with Approximated Computations for Rapid Optimization

TL;DR

This paper introduces a learned optimization framework that jointly tackles iteration count and per-iteration complexity, and demonstrates the effectiveness of the method on two representative problems: hybrid beamforming and robust principal component analysis.

Abstract

Optimization-based solvers play a central role in a wide range of signal processing and communication tasks. However, their applicability in latency-sensitive systems is limited by the sequential nature of iterative methods and the high computational cost per iteration. While deep unfolding has emerged as a powerful paradigm for converting iterative algorithms into learned models that operate with a fixed number of iterations, it does not inherently address the cost of each iteration. In this paper, we introduce a learned optimization framework that jointly tackles iteration count and per-iteration complexity. Our approach is based on unfolding a fixed number of optimization steps, replacing selected iterations with low-complexity approximated computations, and learning extended hyperparameters from data to compensate for the introduced approximations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on two representative problems: (i) hybrid beamforming; and (ii) robust principal component analysis. These fundamental case studies show that our learned approximated optimizers can achieve state-of-the-art performance while reducing computational complexity by over three orders of magnitude. Our results highlight the potential of our approach to enable rapid, interpretable, and efficient decision-making in real-time systems.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 34 sections, 2 theorems, 44 equations, 6 figures, 5 tables, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $\mathcal{L}_{\rm o}({\boldsymbol{s}}; {\boldsymbol{x}})$ be a differentiable objective function, and let $\bm{\eta}_k$ be comprised of positive step-sizes. Then the update eqn:ElementWiseGD yields a decrease in the objective value as in eqn:descent to first order, i.e., the method retains the d

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Hybrid beamforming case study illustration
  • Figure 2: Rate vs snr, small-scale mimo.
  • Figure 3: Rate vs. snr, large-scale mimo.
  • Figure 4: Low-rank recovery error vs. iterations, synthetic data
  • Figure 5: Convergence for higher-rank ($r=50$) vs lower-rank ($r=5$).
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2
  • proof