Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The non-existence of some Galois representations of moderate dimension in small characteristic

Alexandru Ghitza, Takuya Yamauchi

TL;DR

This work tackles the non-existence of low-dimensional mod-$p$ Galois representations with small ramification. It combines two routes: under GRH, refinements of Moon’s discriminant-based approach rule out irreducible representations of dimensions up to $4$ (and certain totally real cases up to dimension $8$) for $p=2$ and $p=3$; and unconditionally it proves large-image phenomena for $2$-ramified $GSp_4$-valued representations, with GRH then extending non-existence to these symplectic cases. The analysis hinges on sharpened discriminant bounds tied to $p$-lengths, Brauer-type counting of modular representations, and explicit finite-group classifications (notably within $\mathrm{GSp}_4$ and related subgroups), supplemented by computational checks (Magma/Sage) to exhaust remaining possibilities. The results constrain potential connections to automorphy or modularity for small-dimensional Galois representations and illustrate the power of combining analytic GRH-based methods with exact group-theoretic classifications. Overall, the paper advances our understanding of how small ramification restricts the landscape of mod-$p$ Galois representations, with implications for Serre-type modularity questions.

Abstract

Refining arguments of Hyunsuk Moon, under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, we prove the non-existence of irreducible mod 2 Galois representations unramified outside 2 of dimensions $\leq 4$, and of totally real such representations of dimensions $\leq 8$. We also prove the non-existence of irreducible totally real mod 3 representations unramified outside 3 of dimensions $\leq 4$. We show unconditionally that the image of an irreducible mod 2 symplectic 4-dimensional Galois representation that is unramified outside 2 must be large. Under GRH, we then deduce the non-existence of such representations.

The non-existence of some Galois representations of moderate dimension in small characteristic

TL;DR

This work tackles the non-existence of low-dimensional mod- Galois representations with small ramification. It combines two routes: under GRH, refinements of Moon’s discriminant-based approach rule out irreducible representations of dimensions up to (and certain totally real cases up to dimension ) for and ; and unconditionally it proves large-image phenomena for -ramified -valued representations, with GRH then extending non-existence to these symplectic cases. The analysis hinges on sharpened discriminant bounds tied to -lengths, Brauer-type counting of modular representations, and explicit finite-group classifications (notably within and related subgroups), supplemented by computational checks (Magma/Sage) to exhaust remaining possibilities. The results constrain potential connections to automorphy or modularity for small-dimensional Galois representations and illustrate the power of combining analytic GRH-based methods with exact group-theoretic classifications. Overall, the paper advances our understanding of how small ramification restricts the landscape of mod- Galois representations, with implications for Serre-type modularity questions.

Abstract

Refining arguments of Hyunsuk Moon, under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, we prove the non-existence of irreducible mod 2 Galois representations unramified outside 2 of dimensions , and of totally real such representations of dimensions . We also prove the non-existence of irreducible totally real mod 3 representations unramified outside 3 of dimensions . We show unconditionally that the image of an irreducible mod 2 symplectic 4-dimensional Galois representation that is unramified outside 2 must be large. Under GRH, we then deduce the non-existence of such representations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 15 theorems, 35 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

The only degrees $n\leqslant 7$ for which there exist $p$-ramified extensions are:

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Proposition 2.1: Jones--Roberts
  • Corollary 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Remark 2.4
  • Corollary 2.5
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 26 more