Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Ruelle's zeta function for non-Archimedean rational maps

Yunping Jiang, Chenxi Wu

Abstract

We studied the transfer operators defined over $\mathbb{C}_p$-valued analytic functions for subhyperbolic rational maps on $\mathbb{Q}_p$, and showed that the corresponding Ruelle's zeta functions are meromorphic on $\mathbb{C}_p$. We also used $\mathbb{R}$-valued transfer operators to study the shape of the corresponding Julia sets, and proved a Levin-Sodin-Yuditski type identity for general rational maps on $\mathbb{C}_p$. In all the results above, $\mathbb{Q}_p$ can be replaced with any non-Archimedean local field with characteristic $0$, and $\mathbb{C}_p$ the metric completion of its algebraic closure.

Ruelle's zeta function for non-Archimedean rational maps

Abstract

We studied the transfer operators defined over -valued analytic functions for subhyperbolic rational maps on , and showed that the corresponding Ruelle's zeta functions are meromorphic on . We also used -valued transfer operators to study the shape of the corresponding Julia sets, and proved a Levin-Sodin-Yuditski type identity for general rational maps on . In all the results above, can be replaced with any non-Archimedean local field with characteristic , and the metric completion of its algebraic closure.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 8 theorems, 24 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

When $f$ is a polynomial map on $\mathbb{C}_p$ whose all critical points are non-degenerate and whose critical orbits on $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}_p)$ are all disjoint. Then the following two formal power series are identical here $c_i$ are the critical points of $f$, and $\hbox{Fix}(f^{n})$ is the set of fixed points of $f^{n}$. In particular, when both the left-hand side and the right-hand side

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Theorem 1.1: Analogy of baladi2002dynamical
  • Theorem 1.2: Analogy of baladi2002dynamical
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Example 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4: hsia2025zeta
  • Example 2.5
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['lsy']}
  • Definition 4.1
  • Remark 4.2
  • ...and 13 more