Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A vectorial Darboux transformation for integrable matrix versions of the Fokas-Lenells equation

Folkert Müller-Hoissen, Rusuo Ye

TL;DR

The paper develops a vectorial binary Darboux transformation for matrix versions of the first negative Kaup–Newell flow and, via a reduction, for the matrix Fokas–Lenells (FL) equation, enabling exact solution generation from a plane-wave or zero seed. Central to the approach is bidifferential calculus, which yields a Miura-type system linking the KN–1 and FL equations, and a Sylvester/Lyapunov framework that determines the Darboux potential via the matrix $\Omega$. The authors classify a broad spectrum of solutions for the two-component vector FL equation, including multi-solitons, dark/bright solitons, breathers, beating solitons, and rogue waves, obtained in a single non-iterative Darboux step and organized by seed data and spectral configurations. The method provides a nonlinear superposition principle at the level of data, and is extendable to larger matrix sizes and higher-component systems, offering a systematic route to rich integrable dynamics on plane-wave backgrounds with potential applications in optics and nonlinear wave theory.

Abstract

Using bidifferential calculus, we derive a vectorial binary Darboux transformation for an integrable matrix version of the first negative flow of the Kaup-Newell hierarchy. A reduction from the latter system to an integrable matrix version of the Fokas-Lenells equation is then shown to inherit a corresponding vectorial Darboux transformation. Matrix soliton solutions are derived from the trivial seed solution. Furthermore, the Darboux transformation is exploited to determine in a systematic way exact solutions of the two-component vector Fokas-Lenells equation on a plane wave background. This comprises breathers, dark solitons, rogue waves and "beating solitons".

A vectorial Darboux transformation for integrable matrix versions of the Fokas-Lenells equation

TL;DR

The paper develops a vectorial binary Darboux transformation for matrix versions of the first negative Kaup–Newell flow and, via a reduction, for the matrix Fokas–Lenells (FL) equation, enabling exact solution generation from a plane-wave or zero seed. Central to the approach is bidifferential calculus, which yields a Miura-type system linking the KN–1 and FL equations, and a Sylvester/Lyapunov framework that determines the Darboux potential via the matrix . The authors classify a broad spectrum of solutions for the two-component vector FL equation, including multi-solitons, dark/bright solitons, breathers, beating solitons, and rogue waves, obtained in a single non-iterative Darboux step and organized by seed data and spectral configurations. The method provides a nonlinear superposition principle at the level of data, and is extendable to larger matrix sizes and higher-component systems, offering a systematic route to rich integrable dynamics on plane-wave backgrounds with potential applications in optics and nonlinear wave theory.

Abstract

Using bidifferential calculus, we derive a vectorial binary Darboux transformation for an integrable matrix version of the first negative flow of the Kaup-Newell hierarchy. A reduction from the latter system to an integrable matrix version of the Fokas-Lenells equation is then shown to inherit a corresponding vectorial Darboux transformation. Matrix soliton solutions are derived from the trivial seed solution. Furthermore, the Darboux transformation is exploited to determine in a systematic way exact solutions of the two-component vector Fokas-Lenells equation on a plane wave background. This comprises breathers, dark solitons, rogue waves and "beating solitons".

Paper Structure

This paper contains 27 sections, 13 theorems, 330 equations, 19 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

(Miura_sys) implies that $\det(g)$ does not depend on $t$.

Figures (19)

  • Figure 1: Plots of the absolute value of solutions of the scalar FL equation (with $\sigma_1=\sigma_2=1$) obtained with an anti-conjugate pair of spectral parameters from the family in Example \ref{['ex:zero_seed_n=2_anti-conjugate_gammas']}. We set $\gamma = 1+\mathrm{i}$, $a_1 = (1,1)^T$, $a_2 = (\mathrm{i} \, \gamma,1)^T$ and $c_{12}=1$ (left plot), respectively $c_{12}=50$ (right plot).
  • Figure 2: Plots of the absolute value of solutions of the scalar FL equation (with $\sigma_1=\sigma_2=1$) obtained with a $2\times 2$ Jordan block $\Gamma$ with eigenvalue $\gamma = -\mathrm{i}$, and $a_1 = (1, -\frac{1}{2} \mathrm{i})^T$, $a_2 = (1,0)^T$, $\mathrm{Im}(c_{12})=0$, and $\mathrm{Re}(c_{22})=0$, respectively $=50$. Also see Fig. \ref{['fig:scalarFL_2x2Jordan_imag_gamma_2']} for details on the first example.
  • Figure 3: Plots of the absolute value of the first solution of the scalar FL equation displayed in Fig. \ref{['fig:scalarFL_2x2Jordan_imag_gamma']}, at $t=-2, -1,0, 1, 3$. Below is a plot of $\mathrm{Re}(u')$ and $\mathrm{Im}(u')$ at $t=0$. The apparent cusp of $\mathrm{Im}(u')$ at $t=0$ is just a sharp maximum.
  • Figure 4: Plots of the absolute values of the first, and the real part (the imaginary part is similar) of the second component for an $n=1$ solution from the class in Example \ref{['ex:special_pw_breather']}. The parameters are $\alpha = \|A\| = 2$, $\gamma = 1 + \mathrm{i}$, $c_0=c_1=1$, $c_2=0$, but we replaced $w$ by $-w$. The second plot shows the "beating". The velocity is $v \approx 0.3$, the beating period $T' \approx 1$.
  • Figure 5: Plots of the absolute value of the components of an $n=1$ beating soliton solution from the class in Example \ref{['ex:special_pw_beating_solitons']} at $t=-19.2$ (left), $t=0$ (middle) and $t=16.9$ (right). Here we set $A_2=A_1$, $\alpha = 1/(4 A_1^2)$ (so that $\beta=0$ and $w = \sqrt{1-\gamma^2/(16 A_1^4)}$), $A_1 = c_0 = c_1 = 1$, $c_2 =0$ and $\gamma=10$. Comparing the first and the third plot, we observe an exchange of the profiles of the absolute values of the components $u_1'$ and $u_2'$.
  • ...and 14 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (58)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • ...and 48 more