Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Constraint satisfaction problems, compactness and non-measurable sets

Claude Tardif

TL;DR

It is shown that if A has width one, then the compactness of A can be proved in the axiom system of Zermelo and Fraenkel, but otherwise, the compactness of A implies the existence of non-measurable sets in 3-space.

Abstract

A finite relational structure A is called compact if for any infinite relational structure B of the same type, the existence of a homomorphism from B to A is equivalent to the existence of homomorphisms from all finite substructures of B to A. We show that if A has width one, then the compactness of A can be proved in the axiom system of Zermelo and Fraenkel, but otherwise, the compactness of A implies the existence of non-measurable sets in 3-space.

Constraint satisfaction problems, compactness and non-measurable sets

TL;DR

It is shown that if A has width one, then the compactness of A can be proved in the axiom system of Zermelo and Fraenkel, but otherwise, the compactness of A implies the existence of non-measurable sets in 3-space.

Abstract

A finite relational structure A is called compact if for any infinite relational structure B of the same type, the existence of a homomorphism from B to A is equivalent to the existence of homomorphisms from all finite substructures of B to A. We show that if A has width one, then the compactness of A can be proved in the axiom system of Zermelo and Fraenkel, but otherwise, the compactness of A implies the existence of non-measurable sets in 3-space.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 5 theorems, 5 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $A$ be a finite relational structure. Then the compactness of $A$ implies the ultrafilter axiom if and only if $A$ does not admit a cyclic polymorphism.

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Theorem 1.1: ktv
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 4.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.2
  • Lemma 4.3
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['main']}