Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Completions of Restricted Complexity I, Weak Arithmetical Theories

Ali Enayat, Mateusz Łełyk, Albert Visser

TL;DR

The paper introduces the notion of restricted complexity for arithmetical theories and proves that certain weak theories admit completions of restricted complexity, notably ${ m PA}^{-}$ and ${ m IOpen}+{ m Coll}$. It develops a framework of interpretability and partial isomorphisms to witness restricted completions, using a sequence of algebraic model constructions: ${ m Z}[ m X]^{ ext{≥0}}$, Shepherdson’s ${ m S}$, the Dorroh-augmented rings ${ m A}$, and the iterated Shepherdson models ${ m B}$. Each construction yields a completion axiomatizable by a single sentence plus a (potentially infinite) Σ₁-sentences set, thereby separating restricted-complexity completions from other complexity classes (MRDP, truth, nrec). The results illuminate how bounded-quantifier and real-closure techniques can be leveraged to control completeness while maintaining strong algebraic properties, and they set the stage for analogous results in stronger theories and higher-order contexts. The work advances our understanding of incompleteness phenomena by showing that restricted-complexity completions can exist even for theories with full Induction-like strength when coupled with certain collection principles.

Abstract

Given a first-order theory $T$ formulated in the usual language of first-order arithmetic, we say that $T$ is of *restricted complexity* if there is some natural number $n$ and some set $\mathcal A$ of $Σ_n$-sentences such that $T$ can be axiomatized by $\mathcal A$. Motivated by the fact that no consistent arithmetical theory extending $\mathrm{I}Δ_{0}+\mathsf{Exp}$ has a consistent completion that is of restricted complexity, we construct models of arithmetic whose complete theories are of restricted complexity. Our strongest result shows that there is a model of $\mathsf{IOpen + Coll}$ whose complete theory is of restricted complexity, where $\mathsf{Coll}$ is the full collection scheme.

Completions of Restricted Complexity I, Weak Arithmetical Theories

TL;DR

The paper introduces the notion of restricted complexity for arithmetical theories and proves that certain weak theories admit completions of restricted complexity, notably and . It develops a framework of interpretability and partial isomorphisms to witness restricted completions, using a sequence of algebraic model constructions: , Shepherdson’s , the Dorroh-augmented rings , and the iterated Shepherdson models . Each construction yields a completion axiomatizable by a single sentence plus a (potentially infinite) Σ₁-sentences set, thereby separating restricted-complexity completions from other complexity classes (MRDP, truth, nrec). The results illuminate how bounded-quantifier and real-closure techniques can be leveraged to control completeness while maintaining strong algebraic properties, and they set the stage for analogous results in stronger theories and higher-order contexts. The work advances our understanding of incompleteness phenomena by showing that restricted-complexity completions can exist even for theories with full Induction-like strength when coupled with certain collection principles.

Abstract

Given a first-order theory formulated in the usual language of first-order arithmetic, we say that is of *restricted complexity* if there is some natural number and some set of -sentences such that can be axiomatized by . Motivated by the fact that no consistent arithmetical theory extending has a consistent completion that is of restricted complexity, we construct models of arithmetic whose complete theories are of restricted complexity. Our strongest result shows that there is a model of whose complete theory is of restricted complexity, where is the full collection scheme.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 60 sections, 59 theorems, 56 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose $T$ is a consistent theory formulated in the language of arithmetic such that $\mathrm{I}\Delta _{0}+\mathsf{Exp}$ is provable in $T$. If $T$ is of restricted complexity, then $T$ is incomplete.

Theorems & Definitions (121)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Example 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 111 more