Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Competitive Online Transportation Simplified

Stephen Arndt, Benjamin Moseley, Kirk Pruhs, Marc Uetz

TL;DR

This paper addresses online transportation with multiple garages of varying capacities by introducing a relaxed itinerant-car problem and a sequence of algorithms that progressively handle general metrics. It begins with Algorithm A on a power-of-two tree metric, proving a $(2m-2)$-competitive bound via bottleneck matching insights, and then extends to general metric spaces with Algorithm B, achieving $(8m-7)$-competitiveness through MST-based embeddings. A final Algorithm C translates the itinerant-car results back to the original online transportation problem, preserving the competitiveness at $(8m-7)$ and avoiding reliance on MPFS-based decompositions. The approach offers a simpler, more transparent analysis relative to prior star-decomposition methods, contributing a pathway toward the conjectured $(2m-1)$-competitive deterministic algorithm for online transportation.

Abstract

The setting for the online transportation problem is a metric space $M$, populated by $m$ parking garages of varying capacities. Over time cars arrive in $M$, and must be irrevocably assigned to a parking garage upon arrival in a way that respects the garage capacities. The objective is to minimize the aggregate distance traveled by the cars. In 1998, Kalyanasundaram and Pruhs conjectured that there is a $(2m-1)$-competitive deterministic algorithm for the online transportation problem, matching the optimal competitive ratio for the simpler online metric matching problem. Recently, Harada and Itoh presented the first $O(m)$-competitive deterministic algorithm for the online transportation problem. Our contribution is an alternative algorithm design and analysis that we believe is simpler.

Competitive Online Transportation Simplified

TL;DR

This paper addresses online transportation with multiple garages of varying capacities by introducing a relaxed itinerant-car problem and a sequence of algorithms that progressively handle general metrics. It begins with Algorithm A on a power-of-two tree metric, proving a -competitive bound via bottleneck matching insights, and then extends to general metric spaces with Algorithm B, achieving -competitiveness through MST-based embeddings. A final Algorithm C translates the itinerant-car results back to the original online transportation problem, preserving the competitiveness at and avoiding reliance on MPFS-based decompositions. The approach offers a simpler, more transparent analysis relative to prior star-decomposition methods, contributing a pathway toward the conjectured -competitive deterministic algorithm for online transportation.

Abstract

The setting for the online transportation problem is a metric space , populated by parking garages of varying capacities. Over time cars arrive in , and must be irrevocably assigned to a parking garage upon arrival in a way that respects the garage capacities. The objective is to minimize the aggregate distance traveled by the cars. In 1998, Kalyanasundaram and Pruhs conjectured that there is a -competitive deterministic algorithm for the online transportation problem, matching the optimal competitive ratio for the simpler online metric matching problem. Recently, Harada and Itoh presented the first -competitive deterministic algorithm for the online transportation problem. Our contribution is an alternative algorithm design and analysis that we believe is simpler.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 5 theorems, 3 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Lemma 3

$\sum_{t=1}^k 2^{\ell(t)-1} = \hbox{BottleOpt}(J, T)$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Example tree metric $T$ showing that algorithm $\mathcal{C}$ does not have the MPFS property

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Conjecture 1
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Theorem 4
  • proof
  • Lemma 5
  • proof
  • Theorem 6
  • proof
  • Theorem 7
  • ...and 1 more