Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Filament Rift: $Λ$CDM's Structural Challenge Against Observation

Saeed Tavasoli, Parsa Ghafour

TL;DR

This study tests the reliability of $\Lambda$CDM predictions for the Cosmic Web by comparing observed SDSS DR10 filaments ($z<0.05$) with those from the IllustrisTNG300-1 simulation ($z=0$) using the GrAviPaSt filament finder. It builds macro- and micro-filament catalogs and analyzes their lengths, mass-density contrasts, and the properties of filament galaxies, including $GG$ (group-group) and $CC$ (cluster-cluster) subcategories. The results reveal that observed macro-filaments are denser yet shorter than their simulated counterparts, while micro-filaments in $\Lambda$CDM generally show higher density contrasts at fixed geometry; unexpectedly, the $GG$ and $CC$ trends invert between data and model. These tensions indicate potential gaps in the environmental processes modeled in simulations and motivate further multi-method, multi-simulation cross-checks to robustly test large-scale structure formation and galaxy evolution in filaments.

Abstract

This study presents the first extended comparison of cosmic filaments identified in SDSS DR10 observations ($z < 0.05$) and the IllustrisTNG300-1 $Λ$CDM simulation ($z = 0$), utilizing the novel GrAviPaSt filament-finder method. The analyses are performed on both macro- and micro-filaments, each characterized by their length, thickness, and contrast in mass density. In addition to total sample comparisons, two subcategories of micro-filaments, GG (linking galaxy groups) and CC (linking galaxy clusters), are introduced to further analyze discrepancies between the $Λ$CDM model and observation. While $Λ$CDM produces extended macro-filaments, such structures are largely absent in SDSS, and where present, they exhibit higher densities than their simulated counterparts. Micro-filaments also show notable density discrepancies: at fixed length and thickness, observational filaments are significantly denser than those in the simulation. Employing radial density profiles reveal that micro-filaments in the $Λ$CDM simulation exhibit higher contrasts in mass density relative to the background compared to their observational counterparts. Notably, CC type micro-filaments displayed enhanced density contrasts over GG types in the simulation, while observational data showed the opposite trend. Furthermore, SDSS galaxies in both GG and CC micro-filaments exhibit lower specific star formation rates (sSFR) and older stellar populations, while TNG300-1 micro-filaments host more actively star-forming galaxies within the intermediate stellar mass range. These results reveal persistent discrepancies between observational data and the $Λ$CDM reconstruction of cosmic filaments, pointing to possible tensions in our current understanding of large-scale structures and their environmental effects on galaxy evolution.

The Filament Rift: $Λ$CDM's Structural Challenge Against Observation

TL;DR

This study tests the reliability of CDM predictions for the Cosmic Web by comparing observed SDSS DR10 filaments () with those from the IllustrisTNG300-1 simulation () using the GrAviPaSt filament finder. It builds macro- and micro-filament catalogs and analyzes their lengths, mass-density contrasts, and the properties of filament galaxies, including (group-group) and (cluster-cluster) subcategories. The results reveal that observed macro-filaments are denser yet shorter than their simulated counterparts, while micro-filaments in CDM generally show higher density contrasts at fixed geometry; unexpectedly, the and trends invert between data and model. These tensions indicate potential gaps in the environmental processes modeled in simulations and motivate further multi-method, multi-simulation cross-checks to robustly test large-scale structure formation and galaxy evolution in filaments.

Abstract

This study presents the first extended comparison of cosmic filaments identified in SDSS DR10 observations () and the IllustrisTNG300-1 CDM simulation (), utilizing the novel GrAviPaSt filament-finder method. The analyses are performed on both macro- and micro-filaments, each characterized by their length, thickness, and contrast in mass density. In addition to total sample comparisons, two subcategories of micro-filaments, GG (linking galaxy groups) and CC (linking galaxy clusters), are introduced to further analyze discrepancies between the CDM model and observation. While CDM produces extended macro-filaments, such structures are largely absent in SDSS, and where present, they exhibit higher densities than their simulated counterparts. Micro-filaments also show notable density discrepancies: at fixed length and thickness, observational filaments are significantly denser than those in the simulation. Employing radial density profiles reveal that micro-filaments in the CDM simulation exhibit higher contrasts in mass density relative to the background compared to their observational counterparts. Notably, CC type micro-filaments displayed enhanced density contrasts over GG types in the simulation, while observational data showed the opposite trend. Furthermore, SDSS galaxies in both GG and CC micro-filaments exhibit lower specific star formation rates (sSFR) and older stellar populations, while TNG300-1 micro-filaments host more actively star-forming galaxies within the intermediate stellar mass range. These results reveal persistent discrepancies between observational data and the CDM reconstruction of cosmic filaments, pointing to possible tensions in our current understanding of large-scale structures and their environmental effects on galaxy evolution.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 3 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Median trends of macro-filament mass density contrast ($\delta_{M_{\odot}/h}$) are shown with respect to filament length for both observational and simulation datasets, with $1\sigma$ scatter represented as error bars. Histograms of the distributions are displayed adjacent to the central plot to highlight the comparative structure of the two samples.
  • Figure 2: Median trends of micro-filament mass density contrast ($\delta_{M_{\odot}/h}$) with respect to length and thickness are shown for the $Total$, $GG$, and $CC$ categories, arranged from top to bottom. Error bars represent the $1\sigma$ scatter. Dashed lines and darker colors correspond to the $\Lambda$CDM simulation dataset, while solid lines and lighter colors denote the observational data.
  • Figure 3: Radial (left) and longitudinal (right) mass density contrast profiles for micro-filament samples are shown for both the $\Lambda$CDM simulation (top) and the observational dataset (bottom). Each panel presents three micro-filament categories, $Total$, $CC$, and $GG$, distinguished by different colors. Dashed lines represent the fitted curves, based on the Plummer (radial) and Hyperbolic-Secant (longitudinal) profiles.
  • Figure 4: Median trends for distances to micro-filament skeletons are shown relative to the normalized longitudinal position ($\Gamma$), along with corresponding 1$\sigma$ errors, for $CC$ and $GG$ micro-filaments. Results are presented for both the $\Lambda$CDM simulation and observational datasets, with dashed lines indicating simulation-based medians and solid lines representing observational values.
  • Figure 5: Median trends and associated $1\sigma$ errors of the specific star formation rate ($sSFR$) of filament galaxies with respect to stellar mass ($top$) and color-magnitude diagram ($bottom$), shown for both $\Lambda$CDM simulation (dashed lines) and observational (solid lines) samples. The $CC$ and $GG$ filament categories are represented using dark and light colors, respectively.