Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Valid Inference with Imperfect Synthetic Data

Yewon Byun, Shantanu Gupta, Zachary C. Lipton, Rachel Leah Childers, Bryan Wilder

TL;DR

The paper tackles the problem of drawing valid inferences when incorporating synthetic data generated by foundation models into limited-data analyses. It introduces a hyperparameter-free generalized method of moments estimator, GMM-Synth, that augments the target moments with proxy and fully synthetic data via auxiliary parameters, and uses a two-step GMM for efficiency. It provides consistency and asymptotic normality guarantees, showing that synthetic residuals predictive of real residuals can reduce variance, while uninformative synthetic data does not harm asymptotic efficiency. Empirically, GMM-Synth delivers large MSE improvements and substantial gains in effective sample size across four computational social science tasks and two regression settings, outperforming debiasing-based baselines and demonstrating robustness to weaker models. The framework offers a principled, extensible approach for safely leveraging synthetic data from LLMs to support valid, scalable inference in real-world research pipelines.

Abstract

Predictions and generations from large language models are increasingly being explored as an aid in limited data regimes, such as in computational social science and human subjects research. While prior technical work has mainly explored the potential to use model-predicted labels for unlabeled data in a principled manner, there is increasing interest in using large language models to generate entirely new synthetic samples (e.g., synthetic simulations), such as in responses to surveys. However, it remains unclear by what means practitioners can combine such data with real data and yet produce statistically valid conclusions upon them. In this paper, we introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments, providing a hyperparameter-free solution with strong theoretical guarantees to address this challenge. Intriguingly, we find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data (i.e., when they are predictive of each other) can greatly improve estimates of the target parameter. We validate the finite-sample performance of our estimator across different tasks in computational social science applications, demonstrating large empirical gains.

Valid Inference with Imperfect Synthetic Data

TL;DR

The paper tackles the problem of drawing valid inferences when incorporating synthetic data generated by foundation models into limited-data analyses. It introduces a hyperparameter-free generalized method of moments estimator, GMM-Synth, that augments the target moments with proxy and fully synthetic data via auxiliary parameters, and uses a two-step GMM for efficiency. It provides consistency and asymptotic normality guarantees, showing that synthetic residuals predictive of real residuals can reduce variance, while uninformative synthetic data does not harm asymptotic efficiency. Empirically, GMM-Synth delivers large MSE improvements and substantial gains in effective sample size across four computational social science tasks and two regression settings, outperforming debiasing-based baselines and demonstrating robustness to weaker models. The framework offers a principled, extensible approach for safely leveraging synthetic data from LLMs to support valid, scalable inference in real-world research pipelines.

Abstract

Predictions and generations from large language models are increasingly being explored as an aid in limited data regimes, such as in computational social science and human subjects research. While prior technical work has mainly explored the potential to use model-predicted labels for unlabeled data in a principled manner, there is increasing interest in using large language models to generate entirely new synthetic samples (e.g., synthetic simulations), such as in responses to surveys. However, it remains unclear by what means practitioners can combine such data with real data and yet produce statistically valid conclusions upon them. In this paper, we introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments, providing a hyperparameter-free solution with strong theoretical guarantees to address this challenge. Intriguingly, we find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data (i.e., when they are predictive of each other) can greatly improve estimates of the target parameter. We validate the finite-sample performance of our estimator across different tasks in computational social science applications, demonstrating large empirical gains.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 40 sections, 6 theorems, 36 equations, 14 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Our estimate $\hat{\theta}_T$ (as defined in Equation eq:gmm_estimator) is consistent and asymptotically normal. It converges in distribution as where the covariance $V$ is given by and where $G(\theta,\eta)$ is the Jacobian of the population moments at the ground truth parameter values $\theta,\eta$.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Main Results (Logistic regression). We observe large reductions in MSE, especially in very low-label regimes. Each row corresponds to a task (i.e., 1pp, Hedging, Stance, Congressional Bills Data (from top to bottom)); each column corresponds to a metric (i.e., MSE, coverage, confidence interval width (from left to right)). Note that we report the PPI++Synth oracle number for PPI++Synth (see Figure \ref{['fig:cross_fitting_lr']} for PPI++Synth with cross-fitting results). When the best performing PPI++Synth is equivalent to PPI++Proxy (i.e., $\alpha = 1$), we report the second-best performing PPI++Synth method. See Figure \ref{['fig:grid-search-lr']} in Appendix \ref{['appx:results']} for full grid-search results over different $\alpha$ values. Results are averaged over 200 trials.
  • Figure 2: Main Results (OLS). We again observe large reductions in MSE, especially in very low-label regimes. Each row corresponds to a task (i.e., 1pp, Hedging, Stance, Congressional Bills Data (from top to bottom)); each column corresponds to a metric (i.e., MSE, coverage, confidence interval width (from left to right)). Note that we report the PPI++Synth oracle number for PPI++Synth (see Figure \ref{['fig:cross_fitting_ols']} for PPI++Synth with cross-fitting results). When the best performing PPI++Synth is equivalent to PPI++Proxy (i.e., $\alpha = 1$), we report the second-best performing PPI++Synth method. See Figure \ref{['fig:grid-search-ols']} in Appendix \ref{['appx:results']} for full grid-search results over different $\alpha$ values. Results are averaged over 200 trials.
  • Figure 3: Performance of a naive estimator for logistic regression (top) and OLS (bottom) using synthetic data only (Politeness (Hedging), Stance, Congressional Bills (from left to right)). We clearly observe that naively using only synthetic data for the estimation task leads to largely biased estimates, as expected.
  • Figure 4: Effective sample size for logistic regression (Politeness (1pp), Politeness (Hedging), Stance, Congressional Bills (from left to right)). We observe large gains in effective sample size, up to more than 50%. This represents how many human annotations the method effectively saves while maintaining the same performance (in terms of mean squared error).
  • Figure 5: Effective sample size for OLS (Politeness (1pp), Politeness (Hedging), Stance, Congressional Bills (from left to right)). The RePPI method is omitted from the 1pp plot because its effective sample size drops too low.
  • ...and 9 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Proposition 1
  • Theorem 1
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • proof
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3