Multiplicity dependence of the entropy and heat capacity for pp collisions at LHC energies
C. E. Munguía López, D. Rosales Herrera, J. R. Alvarado García, A. Fernández Téllez, J. E. Ramírez
TL;DR
This work analyzes how the transverse momentum spectrum in pp collisions at LHC energies depends on event multiplicity within a nonextensive, heavy-tailed string-tension framework. The authors fit the $p_T$ spectra using a confluent hypergeometric (Tricomi) form and a Tsallis-like $q$-exponential, establishing correlations between the nonextensivity parameters and a temperature-like scale $T_U$. They compute moments, Shannon entropy, and heat capacity for spectra categorized by ALICE V0M and SPD multiplicity estimators, finding classifier-dependent trends: SPD exhibits stronger hardening, larger entropy, and increasing heat capacity with multiplicity, while V0M shows signs of saturation and sometimes decreasing heat capacity. The results highlight that event-selection biases significantly affect inferred observables and suggest extending the analysis to additional event-shape selectors and collision systems to test the robustness of nonextensive descriptions in high-energy collisions.
Abstract
We investigate the multiplicity dependence of the transverse momentum spectrum of the charged particle production in pp collisions at LHC energies. To this end, we consider the experimental data sets classified with different multiplicity estimators, defined by the ALICE Collaboration, that are analyzed within the framework of nonextensive particle production. We compute the variance, kurtosis, Shannon entropy, and heat capacity of the $p_T$ spectrum to study the hardening process as a function of the multiplicity and temperature under the different event classifiers. We found that both the Shannon entropy and the heat capacity show different responses for the triggers at the forward-backward and midrapidity regions. We emphasize that the selection of event biases may induce different responses in estimating theoretical and phenomenological observables that could lead to misleading conclusions.
