X-ray flux -- mass relation for $z\gtrsim 0.7$ galaxy clusters
Natalia Lyskova, Eugene Churazov, Ildar Khabibullin, Rashid Sunyaev, Marat Gilfanov, Sergey Sazonov
TL;DR
This work tests and calibrates the use of the observed X-ray flux F_X in the 0.5–2 keV band as a mass proxy for distant galaxy clusters (z ≳ 0.6–0.7). By combining eROSITA X-ray data with SZ-based ACT DR5 masses and MaDCoWS co-detections, the authors derive a modified F_X–M_{500c} scaling M_{500c} = 1.2×10^{14} M_⊙ · η · (F_X/10^{−14} erg s^{−1} cm^{−2})^{0.57} · z^{0.5}, where η captures survey- and method-dependent offsets. For the calibration sample (36 clusters, z > 0.7), they find η ≈ 0.80 with a scatter of ~34% between F_X-predicted and SZ masses; when using weak-lensing-calibrated masses, η increases to ≈1.13. Extending the calibration to ~400 ACT DR5 clusters confirms that F_X serves as a crude but practical mass proxy at high redshift, offering a ~34% RMS accuracy and valuable utility for pre-selecting massive clusters for follow-up studies. These results provide a cost-effective path to mass estimates from all-sky X-ray data, complementing SZ and WL measurements for cosmological applications.
Abstract
We use a subsample of co-detections of the ACT and MaDCoWS cluster catalogs to verify the predicted relation between the observed X-ray flux $F_X$ in the 0.5-2~keV band and the cluster mass $M_{\rm 500c}$ for halos at $z>0.6-0.7$. We modify this relation by introducing a correction coefficient $η$, which is supposed to encapsulate factors associated with a particular method of flux estimation, the sample selection function, the definition of the cluster mass, etc. We show that the X-ray flux, being the most basic X-ray observable, serves as a convenient and low-cost mass indicator for distant galaxy clusters with photometric or even missing redshifts (by setting $z=1$) as long as it is known that $z\gtrsim 0.6-0.7$. The correction coefficient $η$ is $\approx 0.8$ if $M^{\rm UPP}_{\rm 500c}$ from the ACT-DR5 catalog are used as cluster masses and $η\approx 1.1$ if weak-lensing-calibrated masses $M^{\rm Cal}_{\rm 500c}$ are used instead.
