Evolution of AI Agent Registry Solutions: Centralized, Enterprise, and Distributed Approaches
Aditi Singh, Abul Ehtesham, Mahesh Lambe, Jared James Grogan, Abhishek Singh, Saket Kumar, Luca Muscariello, Vijoy Pandey, Guillaume Sauvage De Saint Marc, Pradyumna Chari, Ramesh Raskar
TL;DR
As autonomous AI agents proliferate across domains, traditional web infrastructure struggles with sub-second identity resolution, verifiable metadata, and privacy-preserving discovery. The paper analyzes five registry architectures—MCP Registry, A2A, AGNTCY ADS, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, and NANDA Index—and evaluates them along security, authentication, scalability, and maintainability, highlighting the trade-offs between centralized control, enterprise governance, and distributed resilience. It argues for registries that provide cryptographic identity binding, verifiable metadata, and federated trust, and it outlines design pathways toward an interoperable Internet of AI Agents. The proposed Path Ahead envisions a switchboard-like, federated registry ecosystem with phased deployments to enable cross-domain discovery, policy governance, and verifiable capability semantics at scale.
Abstract
Autonomous AI agents now operate across cloud, enterprise, and decentralized domains, creating demand for registry infrastructures that enable trustworthy discovery, capability negotiation, and identity assurance. We analyze five prominent approaches: (1) MCP Registry (centralized publication of mcp.json descriptors), (2) A2A Agent Cards (decentralized self-describing JSON capability manifests), (3) AGNTCY Agent Directory Service (IPFS Kademlia DHT content routing extended for semantic taxonomy-based content discovery, OCI artifact storage, and Sigstore-backed integrity), (4) Microsoft Entra Agent ID (enterprise SaaS directory with policy and zero-trust integration), and (5) NANDA Index AgentFacts (cryptographically verifiable, privacy-preserving fact model with credentialed assertions). Using four evaluation dimensions: security, authentication, scalability, and maintainability, we surface architectural trade-offs between centralized control, enterprise governance, and distributed resilience. We conclude with design recommendations for an emerging Internet of AI Agents requiring verifiable identity, adaptive discovery flows, and interoperable capability semantics.
