Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Streamlined WZ method proofs of Van Hamme supercongruences

Andres Valloud

TL;DR

The paper develops a systematic WZ-based framework to prove Van Hamme supercongruences by constructing generalized WZ pairs and employing a degree-elimination strategy that yields linear telescoping via a cleverly chosen hypergeometric $q(k)$. By coupling this with the Long–Ramakrishna $p$-adic gamma approximations, the author obtains uniform proofs for several Van Hamme congruences, extends known mod-$p$ powers for select cases, and demonstrates that even $(I.2)$ falls under Gosper’s algorithm when viewed through the WZ lens. A key innovation is the concept of a WZ device, which mechanically produces a linear $ ext{Delta}$ and enables degree-collapse across multiple cases, thereby broadening the applicability of the WZ method to $p$-adic supercongruences. Collectively, these methods unify and streamline proofs for $B.2, C.2, D.2, E.2, F.2, G.2, H.2$, with additional extensions and special-case interpretations, and offer a practical blueprint for tackling analogous congruences using WZ techniques.

Abstract

Using the WZ method to prove supercongruences critically depends on an inspired WZ pair choice. This paper demonstrates a procedure for finding WZ pair candidates to prove a given supercongruence. When suitable WZ pairs are thus obtained, coupling them with the $p$-adic approximation of $Γ_p$ by Long and Ramakrishna enables uniform proofs for the Van Hamme supercongruences B.2, C.2, D.2, E.2, F.2, G.2, and H.2. This approach also yields the known extensions of G.2 modulo $p^4$, and of H.2 modulo $p^3$ when $p$ is $3$ modulo $4$. Finally, the Van Hamme supercongruence I.2 is shown to be a special case of the WZ method where Gosper's algorithm itself succeeds.

Streamlined WZ method proofs of Van Hamme supercongruences

TL;DR

The paper develops a systematic WZ-based framework to prove Van Hamme supercongruences by constructing generalized WZ pairs and employing a degree-elimination strategy that yields linear telescoping via a cleverly chosen hypergeometric . By coupling this with the Long–Ramakrishna -adic gamma approximations, the author obtains uniform proofs for several Van Hamme congruences, extends known mod- powers for select cases, and demonstrates that even falls under Gosper’s algorithm when viewed through the WZ lens. A key innovation is the concept of a WZ device, which mechanically produces a linear and enables degree-collapse across multiple cases, thereby broadening the applicability of the WZ method to -adic supercongruences. Collectively, these methods unify and streamline proofs for , with additional extensions and special-case interpretations, and offer a practical blueprint for tackling analogous congruences using WZ techniques.

Abstract

Using the WZ method to prove supercongruences critically depends on an inspired WZ pair choice. This paper demonstrates a procedure for finding WZ pair candidates to prove a given supercongruence. When suitable WZ pairs are thus obtained, coupling them with the -adic approximation of by Long and Ramakrishna enables uniform proofs for the Van Hamme supercongruences B.2, C.2, D.2, E.2, F.2, G.2, and H.2. This approach also yields the known extensions of G.2 modulo , and of H.2 modulo when is modulo . Finally, the Van Hamme supercongruence I.2 is shown to be a special case of the WZ method where Gosper's algorithm itself succeeds.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 6 theorems, 178 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Take a field $\mathbb{F}$ of characteristic zero, and let $F(n, k), G(n, k) : \mathbb{Z}^2 \to \mathbb{F}$ be hypergeometric in both $n$ and $k$. Suppose that for some polynomials $p_0, p_1 \in \mathbb{F}[k]$ one has that holds for $0 \leq k \leq m$. In addition, suppose $p_0, p_1$ are not zero for any such $k$, and that they split into linear factors over $\mathbb{F}$. Then there exist functions

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['p-van-hamme-i2']}
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 9 more