Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Perfecting the Line Graph

Hartosh Singh Bal

Abstract

This paper introduces two canonical constructions that transform arbitrary finite graphs into perfect graphs: the symmetric lift $\mathrm{HL}'_2(G)$, which is purely structural and label-invariant, and the ordered lift $\mathrm{HL}_2(G)$, which depends explicitly on vertex labeling and encodes directional information. Both lifts arise as line graphs of bipartite double covers and are box-perfect. Equivalently, if $\BDC{G}$ denotes the canonical (Kronecker) bipartite double cover of $G$, then \[ \HL'_2(G) \;=\; L(\BDC{G}), \] the line graph of $\BDC{G}$. The symmetric lift $\mathrm{HL}'_2(G)$ forms a canonical 2-cover of the line graph $L(G)$. This involution decomposes $\mathrm{HL}'_2(G)$ into symmetric and antisymmetric components: the symmetric part recovers $L(G)$, while the antisymmetric part yields a signed graph $L^-(G)$, the antisymmetric line graph, with $+1/-1$ edges encoding consistent versus crossed overlaps. Thus, all adjacency and Laplacian eigenvalues of $L(G)$, with multiplicities, appear within those of $\mathrm{HL}'_2(G)$, despite $L(G)$ typically not being a subgraph. For regular graphs such as Paley graphs, this construction yields infinite families of sparse, highly structured regular and box-perfect graphs whose lifts contain large cliques (of size $d$ for $d$-regular bases). When the base graph is an expander, the symmetric lift preserves its spectral expansion while producing dense local clique structure. Similar behavior is observed computationally for random regular base graphs, suggesting a natural framework for the study of box-perfect random regular graphs. Finally, we generalize these constructions to parameterized lifts $\mathrm{HL}_{r,d}(G)$ and $\mathrm{HL}_{r,d}'(G)$ defined on ordered $r$-tuples connected by Hamming distance constraints, which structurally encode the base graph and remain box-perfect.

Perfecting the Line Graph

Abstract

This paper introduces two canonical constructions that transform arbitrary finite graphs into perfect graphs: the symmetric lift , which is purely structural and label-invariant, and the ordered lift , which depends explicitly on vertex labeling and encodes directional information. Both lifts arise as line graphs of bipartite double covers and are box-perfect. Equivalently, if denotes the canonical (Kronecker) bipartite double cover of , then the line graph of . The symmetric lift forms a canonical 2-cover of the line graph . This involution decomposes into symmetric and antisymmetric components: the symmetric part recovers , while the antisymmetric part yields a signed graph , the antisymmetric line graph, with edges encoding consistent versus crossed overlaps. Thus, all adjacency and Laplacian eigenvalues of , with multiplicities, appear within those of , despite typically not being a subgraph. For regular graphs such as Paley graphs, this construction yields infinite families of sparse, highly structured regular and box-perfect graphs whose lifts contain large cliques (of size for -regular bases). When the base graph is an expander, the symmetric lift preserves its spectral expansion while producing dense local clique structure. Similar behavior is observed computationally for random regular base graphs, suggesting a natural framework for the study of box-perfect random regular graphs. Finally, we generalize these constructions to parameterized lifts and defined on ordered -tuples connected by Hamming distance constraints, which structurally encode the base graph and remain box-perfect.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 42 sections, 27 theorems, 63 equations, 5 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Each vertex of $\mathrm{HL}_2(G)$ corresponds to a directed edge $(u,v)$ with $\phi(u)<\phi(v)$. Two such vertices $(u,v)$ and $(x,y)$ are adjacent in $\mathrm{HL}_2(G)$ if and only if the corresponding bipartite edges $u'\!-\!v"$ and $x'\!-\!y"$ share an endpoint in $B_{\mathrm{HL}}(G)$. Equivalent

Theorems & Definitions (60)

  • Definition 1: Ordered Lift $\mathrm{HL}_2(G)$
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Definition 2: Symmetric Lift $\mathrm{HL}'_2(G)$
  • Remark 1: Canonical double cover / tensor product viewpoint
  • Theorem 1: Line-graph connectivity
  • Corollary 1: Connectivity criterion for the ordered lift
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • ...and 50 more