Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hydrodynamical modeling of SN 2025kg associated with the Fast X-ray Transient EP250108a

L. M. Roman Aguilar, M. C. Bersten

TL;DR

The paper uses a 1D radiation-hydrodynamics approach to model SN 2025kg, testing energy sources including $^{56}$Ni decay, magnetar spin, and CSM interaction to reproduce the double-peaked light curve and velocity evolution. A Ni-only solution demands a large nickel mass (~0.85 M⊙) and low ejecta mass (~1.9 M⊙) with $E \sim 2\times 10^{51}$ erg, which is difficult to sustain; a magnetar engine with $P \sim 2.9$ ms and $B \sim 2.8\times 10^{15}$ G, plus ~0.2 M⊙ of Ni, along with a dense CSM ($M_{CSM} \approx 0.27$ M⊙, $R_{CSM} \approx 500 R_⊙$) reproduces both the main peak and the early cooling phase. The results favor a magnetar-powered mechanism for SN 2025kg and link its properties to SN 2023pel, suggesting a common magnetar-driven channel for similar high-energy transients and a possible binary-progenitor origin. The study situates SN 2025kg among other energetic SNe with diverse luminosities but relatively uniform velocities, highlighting the role of CSM in shaping early emission and reinforcing binary evolution scenarios in this class.

Abstract

Supernovae (SNe) associated with X-Ray Flashes (XRFs) are extremely rare. Therefore, the discovery of each new object in this class offers a unique opportunity to improve our understanding about their origins and potential connection with other high-energy phenomena. SN 2025kg is one of the most recent events discovered in this category, and exhibits a double-peaked light curve, with an initial cooling phase followed by the main peak. Here, we investigate the possible mechanisms powering its bolometric light curve and expansion velocities, using numerical calculations to simulate the explosion. We found that low ejecta masses (Mej ~ 2 Msun) and moderate explosion energies (E ~ 2e51 erg) are required to reproduce the data. Our models also show that a large amount of nickel (M_Ni = 0.85 Msun) is needed to achieve the high luminosity of SN 2025kg, which makes this scenario difficult to sustain. As an alternative, we explore a model in which a millisecond magnetar serves as the primary energy source. A magnetar with a spin period of 3 ms, approximately, and a magnetic field of 28e14 G gives an adequate match to the data. To account for the early cooling phase, we assume the presence of a dense circumstellar material surrounding the progenitor, with a mass of 0.27 Msun and an extension of 500 Rsun. A comparison and modeling of a select group of SNe--SN 2006aj, SN 2020bvc and SN 2023pel--is also presented. A remarkable similarity emerges between SN 2025kg and SN 2023pel. As SN 2023pel was recently proposed to be powered by a magnetar, this further supports the magnetar scenario for SN 2025kg.

Hydrodynamical modeling of SN 2025kg associated with the Fast X-ray Transient EP250108a

TL;DR

The paper uses a 1D radiation-hydrodynamics approach to model SN 2025kg, testing energy sources including Ni decay, magnetar spin, and CSM interaction to reproduce the double-peaked light curve and velocity evolution. A Ni-only solution demands a large nickel mass (~0.85 M⊙) and low ejecta mass (~1.9 M⊙) with erg, which is difficult to sustain; a magnetar engine with ms and G, plus ~0.2 M⊙ of Ni, along with a dense CSM ( M⊙, ) reproduces both the main peak and the early cooling phase. The results favor a magnetar-powered mechanism for SN 2025kg and link its properties to SN 2023pel, suggesting a common magnetar-driven channel for similar high-energy transients and a possible binary-progenitor origin. The study situates SN 2025kg among other energetic SNe with diverse luminosities but relatively uniform velocities, highlighting the role of CSM in shaping early emission and reinforcing binary evolution scenarios in this class.

Abstract

Supernovae (SNe) associated with X-Ray Flashes (XRFs) are extremely rare. Therefore, the discovery of each new object in this class offers a unique opportunity to improve our understanding about their origins and potential connection with other high-energy phenomena. SN 2025kg is one of the most recent events discovered in this category, and exhibits a double-peaked light curve, with an initial cooling phase followed by the main peak. Here, we investigate the possible mechanisms powering its bolometric light curve and expansion velocities, using numerical calculations to simulate the explosion. We found that low ejecta masses (Mej ~ 2 Msun) and moderate explosion energies (E ~ 2e51 erg) are required to reproduce the data. Our models also show that a large amount of nickel (M_Ni = 0.85 Msun) is needed to achieve the high luminosity of SN 2025kg, which makes this scenario difficult to sustain. As an alternative, we explore a model in which a millisecond magnetar serves as the primary energy source. A magnetar with a spin period of 3 ms, approximately, and a magnetic field of 28e14 G gives an adequate match to the data. To account for the early cooling phase, we assume the presence of a dense circumstellar material surrounding the progenitor, with a mass of 0.27 Msun and an extension of 500 Rsun. A comparison and modeling of a select group of SNe--SN 2006aj, SN 2020bvc and SN 2023pel--is also presented. A remarkable similarity emerges between SN 2025kg and SN 2023pel. As SN 2023pel was recently proposed to be powered by a magnetar, this further supports the magnetar scenario for SN 2025kg.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 1 figure, 1 table.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Comparison between SN 2025kg and a set of SNe associated with high-energy emission. Top panel: Bolometric LCs. Bottom panel: Photospheric and FeII line velocities. Black symbols show the available data for SN 2025kg (stars from Rastinejad:25, triangles from Li:25, and circles from Gokul:25). Pink, yellow, and cyan circles correspond to XRF-SN 2006aj, GRB-SN 2023pel, and SN 2020bvc, respectively. The black solid line represents our preferred model for SN 2025kg, which includes CSM interaction, a magnetar and some Ni. Black dashed and dash-dotted lines represent the Ni model and the magnetar model (see Sec. \ref{['sec:results']} for details). Pink and cyan lines correspond to models of SN 2006aj and SN 2020bvc Roman:2023, respectively. Error bars have been included when possible. Inset: A model with a different CSM distribution (dotted line) hints at a closer match at early-time velocities.