Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rapidity-Dependent Spin Decomposition of the Nucleon

Florian Hechenberger, Kiminad A. Mamo, Ismail Zahed

Abstract

We show that the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the generalized parton distributions (GPDs) has two distinct interpretations: at zero skewness ($η=0$) it yields the familiar impact-parameter density, while at finite skewness ($η\neq 0$) it encodes a genuine parton-nucleon correlation whose norm decreases predictably with the rapidity gap $Δy = 2\mathrm{artanh} η$. This rapidity dependence produces universal rapidity-modified Ji identities linking helicity, orbital, and total angular momenta analytically. Using linear open- and closed string Regge trajectories constrained by empirical PDFs, spectroscopy and form factor data, we obtain the leading twist GPDs $H,E,\widetilde{H}$ across the full $(x,η,t)$ range. Numerical Mellin Barnes inversion agrees with existing lattice data and yields rapidity resolved predictions for Jefferson Lab 12 GeV, the Electron Ion Collider, and forthcoming lattice studies.

Rapidity-Dependent Spin Decomposition of the Nucleon

Abstract

We show that the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the generalized parton distributions (GPDs) has two distinct interpretations: at zero skewness () it yields the familiar impact-parameter density, while at finite skewness () it encodes a genuine parton-nucleon correlation whose norm decreases predictably with the rapidity gap . This rapidity dependence produces universal rapidity-modified Ji identities linking helicity, orbital, and total angular momenta analytically. Using linear open- and closed string Regge trajectories constrained by empirical PDFs, spectroscopy and form factor data, we obtain the leading twist GPDs across the full range. Numerical Mellin Barnes inversion agrees with existing lattice data and yields rapidity resolved predictions for Jefferson Lab 12 GeV, the Electron Ion Collider, and forthcoming lattice studies.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 25 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Non-singlet/isovector helicity (a) and spin-flip (b) GPDs reconstructed from the MB representation \ref{['eq:MB']} using the conformal moments defined in Eqs. \ref{['eq:ReggeMellin']}--\ref{['eq:SkewnessRestore2']}, compared with lattice data Alexandrou:2020zbeHolligan:2023jqh (filled circles). Theory bands are at $\mu=2\,$GeV after NLO evolution. Vertical dashed lines mark $x=\pm\eta$ (ERBL--DGLAP boundaries).
  • Figure 2: Spatial tomography at $\mu=2$ GeV for non-singlet transverse densities $\rho^{u/d}_{n}(\bm b_\perp;\eta)$ (with $n=1,2$) defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:bspaceFT']} for a nucleon polarized along $+\hat{\bm y}$. Panel (a) shows $\eta=0$ (impact-parameter densities). Panel (b) shows $\eta=0.33$, corresponding to a rapidity gap $\Delta y=2\,\operatorname{artanh}(\eta)\simeq 0.69$; the overall norms decrease according to Eq. \ref{['eq:NormVariationFinal']}.
  • Figure 3: Impact-parameter distributions for gluon (a), sea- (b), up- (c), and down- (d) quark helicity densities at $\mu=2$ GeV and $\eta=0$ obtained from Eq. \ref{['eq:Ji_decomp']}.
  • Figure 4: Impact-parameter distributions for up- (a) and down-quark (b) orbital angular momentum and up- (c) and down-quark (d) spin--orbit correlations at $\mu=2$ GeV and $\eta=0$. The densities follow from Eqs. \ref{['eq:Ji_decomp']} and \ref{['eq:spin_orbit']}.
  • Figure 5: Isoscalar spin--orbit correlation (a) and quark orbital angular momentum (b) versus $-t$ at $\mu=2$ GeV, computed from Eqs. \ref{['eq:Ji_decomp']} and \ref{['eq:spin_orbit']} at $\eta=0$. Bands: this work (PDF-propagated uncertainties). Points: lattice results Bhattacharya:2024wtgLHPC:2007blg.
  • ...and 1 more figures