Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Phantom crossing or dark interaction?

Sêcloka L. Guedezounme, Bikash R. Dinda, Roy Maartens

TL;DR

This paper investigates whether a phantom-like expansion ($w_{ m de}<-1$) inferred from recent cosmological data can be explained by a non-gravitational interaction between dark matter and dark energy rather than intrinsic phantom behavior. By modeling the intrinsic dark energy with a thawing quintessence-like equation of state and describing the observed evolution with an effective CPL form $w^{\rm eff}_{\rm de}$, the authors reconstruct the interaction function $Q(z)$ and compute the background evolution $H(z)$ under DESI DR2 BAO, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ data. The analysis finds that the intrinsic $w_{ m de}(z)$ remains non-phantom, while the effective $w^{\rm eff}_{\rm de}(z)$ shows phantom behavior only at high redshift with low significance; the inferred $Q(z)$ changes sign around $z\sim0.5$, indicating DM→DE energy transfer early and DE→DM transfer late. Model comparisons with a flat CPL parametrization show no decisive evidence to prefer one model over the other, though some criteria mildly favor CPL; overall, an interacting dark energy scenario provides a viable alternative to LCDM and phantom DE, consistent with current observations.

Abstract

Recent results from DESI BAO measurements, together with Planck CMB and Pantheon+ data, suggest that there may be a `phantom' phase ($w_{\rm de}<-1$) in the expansion of the Universe. This inference follows when the $w_0, w_a$ parametrization for the dark energy equation of state $w_{\rm de}$ is used to fit the data. Since phantom dark energy in general relativity is unphysical, we investigate the possibility that the phantom behaviour is not intrinsic, but effective -- due to a non-gravitational interaction between dark matter and non-phantom dark energy. To this end, we assume a physically motivated thawing quintessence-like form of the intrinsic dark energy equation of state $w_{\rm de}$. Then we use a $w_0, w_a$ model for the \emph{effective} equation of state of dark energy. We find that the data favours a phantom crossing for the effective dark energy, but only at low significance. The intrinsic equation of state of dark energy is non-phantom, without imposing any non-phantom priors. A nonzero interaction is favoured at more than $3σ$ at $z\sim0.3$. The energy flows from dark matter to dark energy at early times and reverses at later times.

Phantom crossing or dark interaction?

TL;DR

This paper investigates whether a phantom-like expansion () inferred from recent cosmological data can be explained by a non-gravitational interaction between dark matter and dark energy rather than intrinsic phantom behavior. By modeling the intrinsic dark energy with a thawing quintessence-like equation of state and describing the observed evolution with an effective CPL form , the authors reconstruct the interaction function and compute the background evolution under DESI DR2 BAO, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ data. The analysis finds that the intrinsic remains non-phantom, while the effective shows phantom behavior only at high redshift with low significance; the inferred changes sign around , indicating DM→DE energy transfer early and DE→DM transfer late. Model comparisons with a flat CPL parametrization show no decisive evidence to prefer one model over the other, though some criteria mildly favor CPL; overall, an interacting dark energy scenario provides a viable alternative to LCDM and phantom DE, consistent with current observations.

Abstract

Recent results from DESI BAO measurements, together with Planck CMB and Pantheon+ data, suggest that there may be a `phantom' phase () in the expansion of the Universe. This inference follows when the parametrization for the dark energy equation of state is used to fit the data. Since phantom dark energy in general relativity is unphysical, we investigate the possibility that the phantom behaviour is not intrinsic, but effective -- due to a non-gravitational interaction between dark matter and non-phantom dark energy. To this end, we assume a physically motivated thawing quintessence-like form of the intrinsic dark energy equation of state . Then we use a model for the \emph{effective} equation of state of dark energy. We find that the data favours a phantom crossing for the effective dark energy, but only at low significance. The intrinsic equation of state of dark energy is non-phantom, without imposing any non-phantom priors. A nonzero interaction is favoured at more than at . The energy flows from dark matter to dark energy at early times and reverses at later times.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 19 equations, 5 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Triangle plot for DESI DR2 BAO + CMB + Pantheon+ constraints.
  • Figure 2: Intrinsic ( left) and effective ( right) equations of state for dark energy, with uncertainties. The $\Lambda$ model is the straight red line.
  • Figure 3: Evolution of the interaction, relative to the contribution of intrinsic dark energy.
  • Figure 4: Evolution of the effective dark matter equation of state ( left) and the dark sector energy densities ( right).
  • Figure 5: Comparison of the effective equations of state in the interacting model and flat CPL.