Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Impact of spin polarization on transport and thermodynamic coefficients

De-Xian Wei

TL;DR

This work addresses how spin polarization, induced by thermal vorticity $\varpi_{\rho\sigma}$ and thermal shear $\xi_{\rho\sigma}$, modifies transport and thermodynamic coefficients in noncentral heavy-ion collisions. It develops a kinetic theory with spin-dependent distribution, introduces VIP and VIP+SIP polarization, and derives spin-polarized TTCs such as $c_s^2$, $\eta/s$, $\zeta/s$, and $\lambda$. The results show that spin polarization can markedly alter these coefficients, with $c_s^2$ and $\zeta/s$ exhibiting nonmonotonic energy dependence and VIP usually dominating over SIP, while $\eta/s$ and $\lambda$ display monotonic behavior; the nonmonotonic features scale with system size and may signal proximity to the QCD critical point near $\sqrt{s_{NN}} \sim 19.6$–$27$ GeV. Using AMPT simulations across collision systems from O+O to Au+Au, the study suggests potential observable signatures of critical phenomena in spin-related transport, though it omits magnetic-field effects and a fully self-consistent dynamical evolution of spin polarization.

Abstract

This work investigates the influence of parton spin polarization on effective transport and thermodynamic coefficients in noncentral light- and heavy-ion collisions. To model this influence, I consider two sources of spin polarization: thermal vorticity, induced by angular momentum, and thermal shear, arising from local velocity gradients. Using a novel kinetic theory framework, one finds that transport and thermodynamic coefficients -- including the speed of sound squared $c_{s}^{2}$, specific shear viscosity $η/s$, specific bulk viscosity $ζ/s$, and mean free path $λ$ -- are substantially modified by spin polarization effects. Among the two sources, thermal vorticity-induced spin polarization dominates the modifications to these coefficients. Moreover, both $c_{s}^{2}$ and $ζ/s$ exhibit a nonmonotonic dependence on the collision energy, and the associated scaling behaviors potentially serve as indicators of the critical phenomena of quantum chromodynamics.

Impact of spin polarization on transport and thermodynamic coefficients

TL;DR

This work addresses how spin polarization, induced by thermal vorticity and thermal shear , modifies transport and thermodynamic coefficients in noncentral heavy-ion collisions. It develops a kinetic theory with spin-dependent distribution, introduces VIP and VIP+SIP polarization, and derives spin-polarized TTCs such as , , , and . The results show that spin polarization can markedly alter these coefficients, with and exhibiting nonmonotonic energy dependence and VIP usually dominating over SIP, while and display monotonic behavior; the nonmonotonic features scale with system size and may signal proximity to the QCD critical point near GeV. Using AMPT simulations across collision systems from O+O to Au+Au, the study suggests potential observable signatures of critical phenomena in spin-related transport, though it omits magnetic-field effects and a fully self-consistent dynamical evolution of spin polarization.

Abstract

This work investigates the influence of parton spin polarization on effective transport and thermodynamic coefficients in noncentral light- and heavy-ion collisions. To model this influence, I consider two sources of spin polarization: thermal vorticity, induced by angular momentum, and thermal shear, arising from local velocity gradients. Using a novel kinetic theory framework, one finds that transport and thermodynamic coefficients -- including the speed of sound squared , specific shear viscosity , specific bulk viscosity , and mean free path -- are substantially modified by spin polarization effects. Among the two sources, thermal vorticity-induced spin polarization dominates the modifications to these coefficients. Moreover, both and exhibit a nonmonotonic dependence on the collision energy, and the associated scaling behaviors potentially serve as indicators of the critical phenomena of quantum chromodynamics.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 11 equations, 6 figures.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: (Color online) Top panels: Comparison of the specific shear viscosity $\eta/s$ as a function of radius for different systems at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=7.7, 19.6, 200 GeV, using the VIP, VIP+SIP, and non-SP methods. Bottom panels: Corresponding distributions for the specific bulk viscosity $\zeta/s$. All results are shown at proper time $\tau=0.4$ fm for each system.
  • Figure 2: (Color online) Top panels: Comparison of the specific shear viscosity $\eta/s$ as a function of temperature for different systems at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=7.7, 19.6, and 200 GeV, using the VIP, VIP+SIP, and non-SP methods. Bottom panels: Corresponding distributions of the specific bulk viscosity $\zeta/s$. All results are shown at proper time $\tau=0.4$ fm for each system.
  • Figure 3: (Color online) Top panels: Ratios of the coefficients ($c_{s}^{2}$, $\eta/s$, $\xi/s$, $\lambda$) between the VIP and non-SP methods, shown as functions of radius for various systems at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7-200 GeV. Bottom panels: Ratios of the same coefficients between the VIP+SIP and non-SP methods, also as functions of radius for the same systems and energy range. All results are obtained by summing over the proper time interval from $\tau = 0$ to 6 fm. See Supplemental Material Wei:2025sup for a more complete data presentation.
  • Figure 4: (Color online) Top panels: Comparison of the coefficients ($c_{s}^{2}$, $\eta/s$, $\xi/s$, $\lambda$) between the VIP and non-SP methods, shown as functions of temperature for various systems at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7-200 GeV. Bottom panels: Same comparison as above, but between the VIP+SIP and non-SP methods. All results are obtained by summing over the proper time interval from $\tau = 0$ to 6 fm. See Supplemental Material Wei:2025sup for a more complete data presentation.
  • Figure 5: (Color online) Top panels: Ratios of the coefficients ($c_{s}^{2}$, $\eta/s$, $\xi/s$, $\lambda$) between VIP and non-SP methods, and between VIP+SIP and non-SP methods, shown as functions of collision energy for different systems at $R = 4$ fm. These results are extracted from Fig. \ref{['fig3']}. Bottom panels: Same comparisons as above, but shown as functions of collision energy at fixed temperature $T = 0.110$ GeV. These results are extracted from Fig. \ref{['fig4']}.
  • ...and 1 more figures