Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Modular Forms with Only Nonnegative Coefficients

Paul Jenkins, Jeremy Rouse

TL;DR

This work investigates holomorphic modular forms for $SL_2(Z)$ whose Fourier coefficients are all nonnegative. It introduces $A(k)$ as a nonnegativity Sturm bound: if the first $A(k)$ coefficients are nonnegative, then all coefficients are nonnegative, and provides both lower and upper bounds for $A(k)$ as well as a bound on individual coefficients under the nonnegativity hypothesis. The authors prove a sharp-looking weight-asymptotic lower bound $A(k) > \frac{(k-1)^2}{16\pi^2}$ and an explicit upper bound $A(k) \le \frac{1}{7316} k^{4} (\log k + \log \log k)^{2}$ for $k \ge 12$, with $A(k)$ computed exactly for small weights up to $k=88$ and an algorithm handling $36 \le k \le 88$. The methodology combines Poincaré series analysis, the Eisenstein/cusp decomposition, Jenkins–Rouse bounds on cusp coefficients, and explicit linear-inequality searches to certify nonnegativity; the results illuminate sign-change phenomena in modular forms and have potential applications to theta series and related generating functions.

Abstract

We study modular forms for $\textrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$ with no negative Fourier coefficients. Let $A(k)$ be the positive integer where if the first $A(k)$ Fourier coefficients of a modular form of weight $k$ for $\textrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$ are nonnegative, then all of its Fourier coefficients are nonnegative, so that $A(k)$ can be interpreted as a ``nonnegativity Sturm bound''. We give upper and lower bounds for $A(k)$, as well as an upper bound on the $n$th Fourier coefficient of any form with no negative Fourier coefficients.

Modular Forms with Only Nonnegative Coefficients

TL;DR

This work investigates holomorphic modular forms for whose Fourier coefficients are all nonnegative. It introduces as a nonnegativity Sturm bound: if the first coefficients are nonnegative, then all coefficients are nonnegative, and provides both lower and upper bounds for as well as a bound on individual coefficients under the nonnegativity hypothesis. The authors prove a sharp-looking weight-asymptotic lower bound and an explicit upper bound for , with computed exactly for small weights up to and an algorithm handling . The methodology combines Poincaré series analysis, the Eisenstein/cusp decomposition, Jenkins–Rouse bounds on cusp coefficients, and explicit linear-inequality searches to certify nonnegativity; the results illuminate sign-change phenomena in modular forms and have potential applications to theta series and related generating functions.

Abstract

We study modular forms for with no negative Fourier coefficients. Let be the positive integer where if the first Fourier coefficients of a modular form of weight for are nonnegative, then all of its Fourier coefficients are nonnegative, so that can be interpreted as a ``nonnegativity Sturm bound''. We give upper and lower bounds for , as well as an upper bound on the th Fourier coefficient of any form with no negative Fourier coefficients.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 9 theorems, 129 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For any positive integer $k \equiv 0 \pmod{4}$ with $k \geq 12$, we have

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Remark
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • proof
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • Lemma 7
  • ...and 8 more