Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum synchronization between two strongly driven YIG spheres mediated via a microwave cavity

Jatin Ghildiyal, Shubhrangshu Dasgupta, Asoka Biswas

TL;DR

The paper addresses how two driven magnon modes embedded in separate YIG spheres can synchronize through indirect coupling via a single-mode microwave cavity. It develops a theoretical framework using a rotating-frame Hamiltonian with Kerr nonlinearities, derives Langevin equations, and applies mean-field linearization to obtain a covariance-based measure of quantum synchronization, $S_q^\phi$. The results show both classical and quantum synchronization can emerge, with $S_q^\phi$ approaching unity under appropriate drive, detuning, and coupling, while increasing thermal occupancy degrades quantum synchronization. This work demonstrates a tunable, cavity-mediated nonlinear mechanism for synchronization in magnonic systems, with potential implications for quantum information processing and hybrid quantum technologies, particularly under low-temperature conditions where quantum effects are more robust.

Abstract

We present a theoretical study of synchronization between two strongly driven magnon modes indirectly coupled via a single-mode microwave cavity. Each magnon mode, hosted in separate Yttrium Iron Garnet spheres, interacts coherently with the cavity field, leading to cavity-mediated nonlinear coupling. We show, by using input-output formalism, that both classical and quantum synchronization emerge for appropriate choices of coupling, detuning, and driving. We find that thermal noise reduces quantum synchronization, highlighting the importance of low-temperature conditions. This study provides useful insights into tunable magnonic interactions in cavity systems, with possible applications in quantum information processing and hybrid quantum technologies.

Quantum synchronization between two strongly driven YIG spheres mediated via a microwave cavity

TL;DR

The paper addresses how two driven magnon modes embedded in separate YIG spheres can synchronize through indirect coupling via a single-mode microwave cavity. It develops a theoretical framework using a rotating-frame Hamiltonian with Kerr nonlinearities, derives Langevin equations, and applies mean-field linearization to obtain a covariance-based measure of quantum synchronization, . The results show both classical and quantum synchronization can emerge, with approaching unity under appropriate drive, detuning, and coupling, while increasing thermal occupancy degrades quantum synchronization. This work demonstrates a tunable, cavity-mediated nonlinear mechanism for synchronization in magnonic systems, with potential implications for quantum information processing and hybrid quantum technologies, particularly under low-temperature conditions where quantum effects are more robust.

Abstract

We present a theoretical study of synchronization between two strongly driven magnon modes indirectly coupled via a single-mode microwave cavity. Each magnon mode, hosted in separate Yttrium Iron Garnet spheres, interacts coherently with the cavity field, leading to cavity-mediated nonlinear coupling. We show, by using input-output formalism, that both classical and quantum synchronization emerge for appropriate choices of coupling, detuning, and driving. We find that thermal noise reduces quantum synchronization, highlighting the importance of low-temperature conditions. This study provides useful insights into tunable magnonic interactions in cavity systems, with possible applications in quantum information processing and hybrid quantum technologies.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 29 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Schematic representation of two YIG (Yttrium Iron Garnet) spheres, ${m}_1$ and ${m}_2$, coupled via a common microwave cavity mode, ${a}$.
  • Figure 2: Limit-cycle trajectories in the $q_{1} \leftrightharpoons p_{1}$ (red) and $q_{2} \leftrightharpoons p_{2}$ (blue) spaces (a, d, g), and variation of the mean values $\bar{q}_{1}$ (red) and $\bar{q}_{2}$ (blue) (b, e, h), along with mean values $\bar{p}_{1}$ (red) and $\bar{p}_{2}$ (blue) (c, f, i). The chosen parameters are: (a--c) $\Omega_{1} = 1$, $\Omega_{2} = 1.00001$, $g_{1} = g_{2} = 0.1$. (d--f) $\Omega_{1} = 1$, $\Omega_{2} = 1.1$, $g_{1} = g_{2} = 0.1$. (g--i) $\Omega_{1} = 1$, $\Omega_{2} = 1.00001$, $g_{1} = 0.2$, $g_{2} = 0.1$. All other parameters are identical across cases: $\Omega_{c} = 1$, $\Delta_{1} = \Delta_{2} = 0.001$, $\Delta_{c} = -0.2$, $K_{1} = K_{2} = 10^{-10}$, and $\gamma_{1} = \gamma_{2} = \gamma_{c} = 0.1$. All parameters are normalized with respect to $\Omega_{1}$ with the initial conditions $(\bar{q}_1,\bar{p}_1)=(1,0) =(\bar{q}_2,\bar{p}_2)$. The limit cycle trajectories are shown till $\Omega_1t =10^5$.
  • Figure 3: Limit-cycle trajectories in the $q_{1} \leftrightharpoons p_{1}$ (red) and $q_{2} \leftrightharpoons p_{2}$ (blue) spaces (a, d, g); variation of the mean values $\bar{q}_{1}$ (red), $\bar{q}_{2}$ (blue) (b, e, h); and $\bar{p}_{1}$ (red), $\bar{p}_{2}$ (blue) (c, f, i). The parameters for each case are: (a--c) $\Omega_{1} = 1$, $\Omega_{2} = 1.00001$,$\Delta_{1} = \Delta_{2} = 0.001$. (d--f) $\Omega_{1} = 1$, $\Omega_{2} = 1.1$, $\Delta_{1} = \Delta_{2} = 0.001$. (g--i) $\Omega_{1} = 1$, $\Omega_{2} = 1.00001$, $\Delta_{1} = 0.001$, $\Delta_{2} = 0.0025$. Other parameters (common to all cases): $\Omega_{c} = 1$, $\Delta_{c} = -0.2$, $g_{1} = g_{2} = 0.5$, $K_{1} = K_{2} = 10^{-10}$, and $\gamma_{1} = \gamma_{2} = \gamma_{c} = 0.1$. All parameters are normalized with respect to $\Omega_{1}$ with the initial conditions $(\bar{q}_1,\bar{p}_1)=(1,0)$ and $(\bar{q}_2,\bar{p}_2)=(2,0)$. The limit cycle trajectories are shown till $\Omega_1t=10^5$.
  • Figure 4: (a) Variation of $S_{q}^{\phi}$, with respect to time $t$ , (b) variation of $\bar{S}_{q}^{\phi}$, with respect to the mean phonon number $\bar{n}_{m}$ of the environment. The other parameters are $g_1=g_2=0.1$, $K_1=K_2=10^{-10}$, $\Omega_{1}=1$, $\Omega_{2}=1.1$, $\Omega_{c}=1$, $\Delta_1 = \Delta_2 =0.001$, $\Delta_c =-0.2$, $\gamma_1=\gamma_2=\gamma_c=0.1$, and $\phi= 0.1320$ radian. We have chosen an initial condition $(\bar{q}_1,\bar{p}_1) = (1,1)=(\bar{q}_2,\bar{p}_2)$.