Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Testing and estimation in orthosymmetric Gaussian sequence model

Zeyu Jia, Yury Polyanskiy

TL;DR

This paper analyzes goodness-of-fit testing, density estimation, and likelihood-free hypothesis testing in the Gaussian sequence model with mean constrained to a convex, compact set $\Gamma$. It establishes that for orthosymmetric $\Gamma$, the GOF minimax complexity $n_{\mathrm{gof}}$ is bounded below by the square root of the estimation cost (up to polylog factors), and that this relation becomes tight under the additional quadratically convex (QCO) assumption. It then provides a complete LFHT characterization for $\ell_p$ bodies, showing a universal LFHT regime for $p\ge 2$ and an effective-dimension dependent regime for $p\le 2$, including finite- and infinite-dimensional extensions and concrete examples. A counterexample demonstrates that the two-sided GP conjecture can fail without extra structure, highlighting the necessity of orthosymmetry and convexity in the bounds. Collectively, the results connect estimation, testing, and likelihood-free testing via dimension- and structure-dependent rates, and illuminate how complexity scales with the geometry of $\Gamma$ in high-dimensional Gaussian models.

Abstract

We study the Gaussian sequence model, i.e. $X \sim N(\mathbfθ, I_\infty)$, where $\mathbfθ \in Γ\subset \ell_2$ is assumed to be convex and compact. We show that goodness-of-fit testing sample complexity is lower bounded by the square-root of the estimation complexity, whenever $Γ$ is orthosymmetric. This lower bound is tight when $Γ$ is also quadratically convex (as shown by [Donoho et al. 1990, Neykov 2023]). We also completely characterize likelihood-free hypothesis testing (LFHT) complexity for $\ell_p$-bodies, discovering new types of tradeoff between the numbers of simulation and observation samples, compared to the case of ellipsoids (p = 2) studied in [Gerber and Polyanskiy 2024].

Testing and estimation in orthosymmetric Gaussian sequence model

TL;DR

This paper analyzes goodness-of-fit testing, density estimation, and likelihood-free hypothesis testing in the Gaussian sequence model with mean constrained to a convex, compact set . It establishes that for orthosymmetric , the GOF minimax complexity is bounded below by the square root of the estimation cost (up to polylog factors), and that this relation becomes tight under the additional quadratically convex (QCO) assumption. It then provides a complete LFHT characterization for bodies, showing a universal LFHT regime for and an effective-dimension dependent regime for , including finite- and infinite-dimensional extensions and concrete examples. A counterexample demonstrates that the two-sided GP conjecture can fail without extra structure, highlighting the necessity of orthosymmetry and convexity in the bounds. Collectively, the results connect estimation, testing, and likelihood-free testing via dimension- and structure-dependent rates, and illuminate how complexity scales with the geometry of in high-dimensional Gaussian models.

Abstract

We study the Gaussian sequence model, i.e. , where is assumed to be convex and compact. We show that goodness-of-fit testing sample complexity is lower bounded by the square-root of the estimation complexity, whenever is orthosymmetric. This lower bound is tight when is also quadratically convex (as shown by [Donoho et al. 1990, Neykov 2023]). We also completely characterize likelihood-free hypothesis testing (LFHT) complexity for -bodies, discovering new types of tradeoff between the numbers of simulation and observation samples, compared to the case of ellipsoids (p = 2) studied in [Gerber and Polyanskiy 2024].

Paper Structure

This paper contains 31 sections, 24 theorems, 285 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

For any orthosymmetric, convex, compact set $\Gamma$, we have

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Definition 1: Kolmogorov Dimension
  • Definition 2: Coordinate-wise Kolmogorov Dimension
  • Proposition 1
  • Corollary 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Corollary 2
  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • ...and 39 more