Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multi-qubit Rydberg gates between distant atoms

Antonis Delakouras, Georgios Doultsinos, David Petrosyan

TL;DR

The paper presents a protocol for fast, high-fidelity multi-qubit C_kZ gates in neutral-atom platforms by globally addressing atoms arranged in a star-graph and adiabatically steering between ground states and MIS-like Rydberg configurations. A parity-dependent geometric phase φ_g = π ν_q is imprinted while dynamical phases cancel, enabling C_kZ up to local single-qubit corrections; the scheme extends to distant-qubit gates via a quantum bus of auxiliary atoms. The authors provide a detailed analysis of the adiabatic spectrum, non-adiabatic leakage, and decay/thermal errors, and they show how pulse shaping and STIRAP-based sign changes of the interaction improve fidelity. These results point to enhanced connectivity and reduced gate depth in neutral-atom quantum processors, with fidelities in the few ×10^{−3} regime for small to moderate k and feasible extensions to larger graphs via buses.

Abstract

We propose an efficient protocol to realize multi-qubit gates in arrays of neutral atoms. The atoms encode qubits in the long-lived hyperfine sublevels of the ground electronic state. To realize the gate, we apply a global laser pulse to transfer the atoms to a Rydberg state with strong blockade interaction that suppresses simultaneous excitation of neighboring atoms arranged in a star-graph configuration. The number of Rydberg excitations, and thereby the parity of the resulting state, depends on the multiqubit input state. Upon changing the sign of the interaction and de-exciting the atoms with an identical laser pulse, the system acquires a geometric phase that depends only on the parity of the excited state, while the dynamical phase is completely canceled. Using single qubit rotations, this transformation can be converted to the C$_k$Z or C$_k$NOT quantum gate for $k+1$ atoms. We also present extensions of the scheme to implement quantum gates between distant atomic qubits connected by a quantum bus consisting of a chain of atoms.

Multi-qubit Rydberg gates between distant atoms

TL;DR

The paper presents a protocol for fast, high-fidelity multi-qubit C_kZ gates in neutral-atom platforms by globally addressing atoms arranged in a star-graph and adiabatically steering between ground states and MIS-like Rydberg configurations. A parity-dependent geometric phase φ_g = π ν_q is imprinted while dynamical phases cancel, enabling C_kZ up to local single-qubit corrections; the scheme extends to distant-qubit gates via a quantum bus of auxiliary atoms. The authors provide a detailed analysis of the adiabatic spectrum, non-adiabatic leakage, and decay/thermal errors, and they show how pulse shaping and STIRAP-based sign changes of the interaction improve fidelity. These results point to enhanced connectivity and reduced gate depth in neutral-atom quantum processors, with fidelities in the few ×10^{−3} regime for small to moderate k and feasible extensions to larger graphs via buses.

Abstract

We propose an efficient protocol to realize multi-qubit gates in arrays of neutral atoms. The atoms encode qubits in the long-lived hyperfine sublevels of the ground electronic state. To realize the gate, we apply a global laser pulse to transfer the atoms to a Rydberg state with strong blockade interaction that suppresses simultaneous excitation of neighboring atoms arranged in a star-graph configuration. The number of Rydberg excitations, and thereby the parity of the resulting state, depends on the multiqubit input state. Upon changing the sign of the interaction and de-exciting the atoms with an identical laser pulse, the system acquires a geometric phase that depends only on the parity of the excited state, while the dynamical phase is completely canceled. Using single qubit rotations, this transformation can be converted to the CZ or CNOT quantum gate for atoms. We also present extensions of the scheme to implement quantum gates between distant atomic qubits connected by a quantum bus consisting of a chain of atoms.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 43 equations, 14 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Schematic illustration of a two-dimensional array of atoms irradiated by lasers (shaded blue) to implement the C$_k$Z quantum gates between neighboring atomic qubits in star-graph configurations, or between distant atomic qubits connected by auxiliary atoms prepared initially in state $\ket{1}$. Red transparent circle around a Rydberg excited atom corresponds to blockade range. Inset shows the level scheme of atoms involving the qubit encoding ground state subleveles $\ket{0},\ket{1}$ and the strongly interacting Rydberg state $\ket{r}$.
  • Figure 2: (a) Star-graph configuration of $N=k+1$ atoms. Half-filled circles represent atomic qubits in either state $\ket{0}$ or $\ket{1}$. A global laser field with Rabi frequency $\Omega$ and detuning $\Delta$ couples the atomic states $\ket{1}$ and $\ket{r}$ while atoms in state $\ket{0}$ are decoupled from the laser (inset). Atoms in Rydberg state $\ket{r}$ interact with each other. Graph edges denote Rydberg blockade interactions between the connected atoms, $B= B_{0j}\gg\max(\Delta,\Omega)$, while absence thereof implies weak-interactions, $B_{ij} \ll\max(\Omega)$ for $i,j>0$. (b) Schematic representation of the computational basis states of the atoms $\ket{\mathbf{q}}$, which is the ground state of $\mathcal{H}$ for $-\Delta \gg \Omega$, whereas the corresponding MIS configurations $\ket{R_{\mathbf{q}}}$ is the ground state for $\Delta \gg \Omega$.
  • Figure 3: Circuit implementing the C$_k$Z gate. Applying the Hadamard gates on the target qubit before and after the C$_k$Z gate will result in C$_k$NOT, which is the Toffoli gate for $k=2$.
  • Figure 4: Energy eigenvalues $\mathcal{E}_n$ of Hamiltonian (\ref{['Eq:Hamiltonian']}) for $N=3,4,5$ atoms (left, center, right panels) arranged in symmetric star-graph configurations ($B_{0j}= B, \, B_{jj+1}= \mathrm{const} \, \forall \, j \geq 1$) vs detuning $\Delta$. The parameters are $\Omega=\Omega_0 \, \forall \, \Delta \in [-\Delta_0, \Delta_0]$; $\Delta_0=2.4\Omega_0$, $|B|=6\Omega_0$ ($B\gtrless 0$ for upper/lower panels) for $N=3,4$; and $\Delta_0=3.2\Omega_0$, $|B|=5.6\Omega_0$ for $N=5$. In step I (upper panels) we implement the transformation $\mathcal{U}_{\mathrm{I}}$: Starting in state $\ket{\mathbf{q}} = \ket{\alpha_1}$ for $\Delta=-\Delta_0$, the system adiabatically follows the eigenstate $\ket{\alpha_1}$ with lowest energy $\mathcal{E}_1$ (solid blue line) reaching state $\ket{R_\mathbf{q}}$ for $\Delta=\Delta_0$. In step II (lower panels) we implement the transformation $\mathcal{U}_{\mathrm{II}}$: Now starting in state $\ket{R_\mathbf{q}} = \ket{\alpha_m}$ for $\Delta=-\Delta_0$, the system adiabatically follows the eigenstate $\ket{\alpha_m}$ with highest energy $\mathcal{E}_m$ (solid blue line) returning to state $\ket{\mathbf{q}}$ at $\Delta=\Delta_0$ and acquiring the sign change $(-1)^{\nu_{\mathbf{q}}}$. During steps I and II, the non-adiabatic transitions away from states $\ket{\alpha_{l=1,m}}$ to other instantaneous eigenstates $\ket{\alpha_n}$ are quantified by the dimensionless parameter $\eta_{ln}=|\langle \alpha_l|\partial_t|\alpha_n\rangle|^2 \tau/\Delta_0$ (color depth of the solid lines for the corresponding $\mathcal{E}_n$). Eigenenergies of "dark" eigenstates, decoupled from the laser for all $\Delta$, are not shown.
  • Figure 5: (a) Time dependence of the Rabi frequency $\Omega(t)$ (right vertical axis) and detuning $\Delta(t)$ (left vertical axis) during step I with $B>0$ (a1) and step II with $B<0$ (a2) as per Eqs. (\ref{['eq:PulseI']}) and (\ref{['eq:OmegaDelta']}), with parameters $\Omega_0,\Delta_0,B$ as in Fig. \ref{['Fig:Spectrum']}. (b) Dynamics of populations of the initial/final states $\ket{\mathbf{q}}=\ket{11\ldots 1}$ and the corresponding intermediate MIS states $\ket{R_{\mathbf{q}}}=\ket{1r\ldots r}$ with $\nu_{\mathbf{q}} = k$ Rydberg excitations for $N=k+1=3,4,5$ atom graphs (top, middle, bottom panels) with $\tau=16\pi/\Omega_0$. Inset in each panel shows the total phase $\phi(t) = \arg \braket{\Psi(0)}{\Psi(t)}$ of the state $\ket{\Psi}$ of the system.
  • ...and 9 more figures